public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] PCI: Fix pcibios_update_irq misuse of irq number
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 12:31:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4324891.mqG6Yyfi6J@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54D0A521.7030405@arm.com>

On Tuesday 03 February 2015 10:38:25 Marc Zyngier wrote:
> 
> That's exactly what I thought until Lorenzo reported kvmtool falling
> over because of this write. Obviously, some platforms must actually
> require this (possibly for bridges that are not known by the firmware).

This sounds much like a bug in kvmtool.
 
> Entirely removing that code solves my problem too, but that'd cannot be
> the right solution...

The comment in pdev_fixup_irq() says 

        /* Always tell the device, so the driver knows what is
           the real IRQ to use; the device does not use it. */

which I read to mean that there are drivers that incorrectly use
'pci_read_config_byte(dev, PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE)' as the number
they pass into request_irq, rather than using dev->irq.
However, this means that your patch is actually wrong, because
what the driver cares about is the virtual irq number (which
request_irq expects), not the number relative to some interrupt
controller.

There is another comment in include/linux/pci.h that states
       /*
        * Instead of touching interrupt line and base address registers
        * directly, use the values stored here. They might be different!
        */
       unsigned int    irq;

so apparently this has been a cause for problems in the past,
and drivers that rely on the number are already broken.

I also checked ancient kernel versions from the 2.1 days when the
code was first added. And indeed at the time drivers used to read
the word, but now none of them use the number for anything real,
they were all fixed during linux-2.2 at the latest.

	Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2015-02-03 11:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-28 14:51 [PATCH] PCI: Fix pcibios_update_irq misuse of irq number Marc Zyngier
2015-01-28 15:21 ` Jiang Liu
2015-01-28 15:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2015-01-28 15:43     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-02-02 16:15       ` Marc Zyngier
2015-02-02 16:22         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-02-02 15:57 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-02-02 16:06   ` Jiang Liu
2015-02-02 16:23   ` Marc Zyngier
2015-02-02 16:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-02 18:08   ` Marc Zyngier
2015-02-02 18:20     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-02-02 17:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-02-03 10:38   ` Marc Zyngier
2015-02-03 11:31     ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2015-02-03 11:37       ` Marc Zyngier
2015-02-03 12:57         ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-02-04 15:39       ` [PATCH] kvmtool: don't use PCI config space IRQ line field Andre Przywara
2015-02-06 18:55         ` Will Deacon
2015-02-06 19:02           ` Peter Maydell
2015-02-06 19:07             ` Will Deacon
2015-02-07 21:24               ` arnd at arndb.de

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4324891.mqG6Yyfi6J@wuerfel \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox