From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 11:22:25 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [RESEND] ARM: remove last use of CONFIG_CPU_ARM710
In-Reply-To: <1400836074.31526.14.camel@x220>
References: <1364507176.1345.45.camel@x61.thuisdomein>
 <4305975.PvMXZQ020k@wuerfel> <1400836074.31526.14.camel@x220>
Message-ID: <4338460.K64agCvt26@wuerfel>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Friday 23 May 2014 11:07:54 Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 11:28 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 14 May 2014 11:25:50 Paul Bolle wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 11:17 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > 'git grep -i arm710' tells me that there is also some arm710
> > > > specific code in  arch/arm/mm/proc-arm720.S that we may want to
> > > > remove along with this.
> > > > 
> > > > The DT binding should probably remain untouched though, I think it's
> > > > correct to document the string.
> > > 
> > > That seems to be cpu_arm710_name, __arm710_setup, and everything called
> > > by __arm710_setup. Cleaning that up (as a separate patch) appears to be
> > > trivial. If I do that it would be (sort of educated) guesswork. But I
> > > don't mind doing it. What do you prefer?
> > 
> > I think that would be great. For the first patch, please add 
> > 
> > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > 
> > Once the second patch is reviewed, please add them both to Russell's
> > patch tracker.
> 
> Well, at least that second patch triggered a nice conversation. So I
> should now add the first patch (with your ACK) to the tracker?

Yes, please do that.

	Arnd