From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 13:29:35 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v2 1/7] timekeeping: introduce __current_kernel_time64 In-Reply-To: <1447156675-7418-1-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> References: <1447156675-7418-1-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> Message-ID: <4372800.FdTygmcuyo@wuerfel> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tuesday 10 November 2015 11:57:49 Stefano Stabellini wrote: > __current_kernel_time64 returns a struct timespec64, without taking the > xtime lock. Mirrors __current_kernel_time/current_kernel_time. > Actually it doesn't mirror __current_kernel_time/current_kernel_time > diff --git a/include/linux/timekeeping.h b/include/linux/timekeeping.h > index ec89d84..b5802bf 100644 > --- a/include/linux/timekeeping.h > +++ b/include/linux/timekeeping.h > @@ -19,7 +19,8 @@ extern int do_sys_settimeofday(const struct timespec *tv, > */ > unsigned long get_seconds(void); > struct timespec64 current_kernel_time64(void); > -/* does not take xtime_lock */ > +/* do not take xtime_lock */ > +struct timespec64 __current_kernel_time64(void); > struct timespec __current_kernel_time(void); Please change __current_kernel_time into a static inline function while you are introducing the new one, to match the patch description ;-) Arnd