From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 15:38:14 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v2] ARM: realview: basic device tree implementation In-Reply-To: References: <1399586896-16906-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org> <5678119.IM3FN0FlT6@wuerfel> Message-ID: <4386397.P7WlMhNVxk@wuerfel> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thursday 22 May 2014 15:04:07 Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Thursday 22 May 2014 09:41:39 Linus Walleij wrote: > > >> The question can be rephrased like this: > >> Should we create drivers/soc? > > > > I think we just did, not sure if the patches have made it into linux-next > > already, but there were a couple of other platforms already that want this > > directory. > > Awesomeness. Can you give me the title of a patch or branch > from ARM SoC I should pull in to build on top of this? Then I can > split off all the SoC bus business and have the machine file real > small, nice and clean. I'd have to check again, it seems that as of today, there is no drivers/soc on arm-soc yet. I do remember that there were at least two platforms besides yours that want it though, so we have to coordinate it a bit. Then again, as I expect all of them to go through arm-soc, we can probably resolve the conflicts in our tree. Arnd