From: Yang Shi <yang@os.amperecomputing.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
james.morse@arm.com, will@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix L1 stream table index calculation for 32-bit sid size
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:31:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43c2227a-71c9-4cbf-bfec-5a2fbf698f27@os.amperecomputing.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241003111603.GU1369530@ziepe.ca>
On 10/3/24 4:16 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 01:05:08PM -0700, Yang Shi wrote:
>>> It would make some sense to have something like:
>>>
>>> u64 size = arm_smmu_strtab_max_sid()
>>>
>>> /* Would require too much memory */
>>> if (size > SZ_512M)
>>> return -EINVAL;
>> Why not just check smmu->sid_bits?
>>
>> For example,
>>
>> if (smmu->sid_bits > 28)
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> The check can happen before the shift.
> Sure, but IMHO it reads a bit better to check the size computed from
> the helper
>
> MAX_PAGE_ORDER is often 10, so kmalloc will always fail before we
> reach 28 bits of sid space.
I'm wondering we may just use 31 instead of using some magic number:
if (smmu->sid_bits > 31)
return -EINVAL;
If I understand correctly, the check is mainly used to avoid the u64 ->
u32 overflow. This check guarantee no overflow. If some crazy hardware
really requests that large memory, the allocation will fail.
>
> Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-03 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-02 17:55 [v2 PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix L1 stream table index calculation for 32-bit sid size Yang Shi
2024-10-02 18:14 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-02 18:17 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-10-02 19:04 ` Yang Shi
2024-10-02 19:22 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-10-02 19:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-02 20:00 ` Yang Shi
2024-10-02 20:05 ` Yang Shi
2024-10-03 11:16 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-03 15:31 ` Yang Shi [this message]
2024-10-04 12:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-04 16:05 ` Yang Shi
2024-10-04 16:14 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-04 16:29 ` Yang Shi
2024-10-04 16:37 ` Yang Shi
2024-10-04 16:41 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-04 16:46 ` Yang Shi
2024-10-02 19:50 ` Yang Shi
2024-10-02 18:21 ` Robin Murphy
2024-10-02 18:36 ` Yang Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43c2227a-71c9-4cbf-bfec-5a2fbf698f27@os.amperecomputing.com \
--to=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox