From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: bcm: Don't build brcmstb SMP code when building for V6
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 12:54:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45082124.LP9dKIUraq@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140825172713.GW18411@ld-irv-0074>
On Monday 25 August 2014 10:27:13 Brian Norris wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 09:44:03AM -0500, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:09:07PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 09:06:34PM -0500, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > > From: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
> >
> > > > building for -march=armv6 as happens when building allmodconfig. Since I
> > > > have not been able to identify a way to override the compiler architecture
> > > > selection per file add a Kconfig dependency to ensure this code is not
> > > > built if V6 support is enabled.
> >
> > > I already proposed this solution to override the compiler architecture,
> > > in the same pattern as other similar code in the same directory.
> >
> > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.devicetree/84517
> >
> > > My using 'CFLAGS_<obj> += <flags>', you can compile in v7.
> >
> > I tried that but it wasn't doing the right thing for me - it appeared
> > since the compiler ends up getting both -march=armv7-a and -march=armv6
> > it complained that it couldn't satisfy both options. It might be that
> > this is version dependant or the actual cause wsa something else, I
> > didn't investigate too hard.
I've never seen that happen. Normally, the last option just overrides
all previous conflicting ones.
> If you ever see revisit this or see this again, I'd be interested in
> seeing the gcc args (make V=1) and version that failed. My fix worked
> for me, and I'll likely use it for the next revision if I don't find a
> good reason not to.
FWIW, I haven't seen any problems with the version below:
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-bcm/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-bcm/Makefile
index 67c492aabf4d..546d3d3022a4 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-bcm/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-bcm/Makefile
@@ -38,3 +38,5 @@ ifeq ($(CONFIG_ARCH_BRCMSTB),y)
obj-y += brcmstb.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += headsmp-brcmstb.o platsmp-brcmstb.o
endif
+
+CFLAGS_platsmp-brcmstb.o += -march=armv7-a
Arnd
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-26 10:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-22 2:06 [PATCH] ARM: bcm: Don't build brcmstb SMP code when building for V6 Mark Brown
2014-08-22 5:09 ` Brian Norris
2014-08-22 14:44 ` Mark Brown
2014-08-25 17:27 ` Brian Norris
2014-08-26 10:54 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45082124.LP9dKIUraq@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).