From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 12:24:08 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 00/08] ARM: shmobile: Rework include path (Try 2, Part 1) In-Reply-To: References: <20140520075949.13851.42995.sendpatchset@w520> Message-ID: <4635749.xI9zCngNoZ@wuerfel> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Friday 06 June 2014 11:11:46 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Magnus Damm wrote: > > ARM: shmobile: Rework include path (Try 2, Part 1) > > > > [PATCH 01/08] ARM: shmobile: Move intc.h, cleanup sh_intc.h usage > > [PATCH 02/08] ARM: shmobile: Move dma-register.h > > [PATCH 03/08] ARM: shmobile: Move clock.h > > [PATCH 04/08] ARM: shmobile: Move most of irqs.h, keep some for pinctl > > [PATCH 05/08] ARM: shmobile: Move common.h > > [PATCH 06/08] ARM: shmobile: Move pm-rmobile.h, cleanup sh73xx.h > > [PATCH 07/08] ARM: shmobile: Move pm-rcar.h, cleanup r8a7779 case > > [PATCH 08/08] ARM: shmobile: Move rcar-gen2.h, cleanup r8a7790 case > > > > Olof, here my latest take on the header move that you requested earlier. > > > > This particular series hopefully follows your proposed way and moves the > > most common shared header files for mach-shmobile from > > to "foobar.h" without any workaround. Left are still per-SoC header files > > that will be moved once I know you are comformatble with this format. > > Olof didn't scream, so I guess he's comfortable with it? > Olof? > > If the propagation part is an issue, what about Simon applying it to a separate > branch, to be merged into both soc-for-v3.17 and boards-for-v3.17? I certainly love it. > > Please note that these are only lightly compile tested with a handful > > of defconfigs, but any potential issue should be trivial to fix. > > Indeed. And it touches arch/arm/mach-shmobile only. > > Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann