From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3FD4E77188 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2025 10:24:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Cc:To:Subject:From:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=SnFH98ibQzsvQhtTYNyPTVrfsL5nJpMT8T+fexoCZ8A=; b=MkP1ygVoNBCtacKzgP5/7XS5IM 8l+uSCgeH2I7XK+LcLgbZloalEFfaP9t2WCfHtJVuqOs3K/PUKCvgJozNWzo6QxC1iuBV1MRcivcE 2Hr8oAQUpcTzMedF173IfyCHRtlysc3x/pKNJIiYYywAkz2YfBqT8VowQyd3WYvNjtrBdOQ3PPiOo 59lz6uZpmRn9uag0wA1LwDrfn+Q0IGf2wknClSx41ES+bi+PwYkW/FqJoGT84bI56+PqDuZUcx2JK Vy6FoEUIqjDsqi4cb3X4MYcuWWlx/VPiCN+DmaUTBWidtNrdh3J+VQwFWRZ2RTVEQpselT0HbKjJE 4DHOWadQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tWCBG-0000000EvuL-12fe; Fri, 10 Jan 2025 10:23:54 +0000 Received: from mail-m49231.qiye.163.com ([45.254.49.231]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tWBxM-0000000Et1n-3qZW; Fri, 10 Jan 2025 10:09:34 +0000 Received: from [192.168.60.65] (unknown [103.29.142.67]) by smtp.qiye.163.com (Hmail) with ESMTP id 85663352; Fri, 10 Jan 2025 18:09:25 +0800 (GMT+08:00) Message-ID: <46372c17-d317-4477-9635-36564c73cc6a@rock-chips.com> Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 18:09:24 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird From: Kever Yang Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/17] dt-bindings: pwm: rockchip: Add rockchip,rk3562-pwm To: =?UTF-8?Q?Uwe_Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= Cc: heiko@sntech.de, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Conor Dooley , Rob Herring , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org References: <20241224094920.3821861-1-kever.yang@rock-chips.com> <20241224094920.3821861-12-kever.yang@rock-chips.com> Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-HM-Spam-Status: e1kfGhgUHx5ZQUpXWQgPGg8OCBgUHx5ZQUlOS1dZFg8aDwILHllBWSg2Ly tZV1koWUFITzdXWS1ZQUlXWQ8JGhUIEh9ZQVlDQxpDVh1CQkIfSRhJThpLSlYVFAkWGhdVEwETFh oSFyQUDg9ZV1kYEgtZQVlKS0hVSUJVSk9JVU1MWVdZFhoPEhUdFFlBWU9LSFVKS0lPT09IVUpLS1 VKQktLWQY+ X-HM-Tid: 0a944fb0ac4c03afkunm85663352 X-HM-MType: 1 X-HM-Sender-Digest: e1kMHhlZQR0aFwgeV1kSHx4VD1lBWUc6PRw6NRw*EjIJOQ4wEUpNIjw# M0gaCwFVSlVKTEhNTktITE1DSUtKVTMWGhIXVRAeDR4JVQIaFRw7CRQYEFYYExILCFUYFBZFWVdZ EgtZQVlKS0hVSUJVSk9JVU1MWVdZCAFZQUpLQkM3Bg++ DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; b=CgI98iJrbeouOxI5b3pc4yw7d68VlP0GdydTJiwcX10/5mN0FWV7zhLTXRanZv0ZTZD/hnL1SHzCg3YBgWbnO/UGPiuoYcbjTq2OeVjvfuU6Ow+ExujrV0lg1V6Sd5ZCOgZAQPX/6enhwZ/j/Ecn/1WeiNZWAdMyXOh5dKijOPw=; s=default; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rock-chips.com; v=1; bh=SnFH98ibQzsvQhtTYNyPTVrfsL5nJpMT8T+fexoCZ8A=; h=date:mime-version:subject:message-id:from; X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250110_020933_128953_EF681620 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.61 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Uwe,     Thanks very much for your review. On 2024/12/27 15:24, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > On Tue, Dec 24, 2024 at 05:49:14PM +0800, Kever Yang wrote: >> Add rockchip,rk3562-pwm compatible string. >> >> Signed-off-by: Kever Yang > What is your merge plan here? From my POV merging the pwm update via my > pwm tree would be the easiest. But if you want to let it go via (say) > arm-soc to have it all in a single tree soon and then base new > development on top of that, that would be fine for me, too. I send this in a patch set for a new soc and board because there is no driver change needed, and I think it would be more clear for the new soc support. It will be great if maintainers like you can pick the patches for the module which I guess is preferred way in the kernel maintain rule? Or else I have to follow the comments fromKrzysztof to send patches one by one separately. Thanks, - Kever > In the former case, please tell me. In the latter case: > > Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König > > Best regards > Uwe