From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 10:01:36 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: do not mark s3c2410_plls_add as __init
In-Reply-To: <564A899C.4040402@samsung.com>
References: <8497197.sYxqVOch7s@wuerfel> <4389196.cuM78vZZnJ@wuerfel>
 <564A899C.4040402@samsung.com>
Message-ID: <4654010.UfKTsDKyes@wuerfel>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Tuesday 17 November 2015 10:57:48 Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 17.11.2015 07:17, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Monday 16 November 2015 23:36:42 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>
> >> This should go in through the Samsung tree, so I'll leave it for them to pick
> >> it up (at least for the time being).
> > 
> > Ok, fair enough. Kukjin or Krzysztof, can you pick this up?
> 
> Sure.
> 
> As for the patch I think everything can be converted to init/initdata
> (as in attachment).
> 

I don't think so:

static struct subsys_interface s3c2442_plls169344_interface __initdata = {
        .name           = "s3c2442_plls169344",
        .subsys         = &s3c2442_subsys,
        .add_dev        = s3c2440_plls169344_add,
};

This gets passed into subsys_interface_register(), which is not __init
in turn. subsys_interface_register() then goes on to add
s3c2442_plls169344_interface into a linked list that is traversed
at runtime, but the __initdata section gets discarded so you now
have a broken list.

	Arnd