From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87750D24459 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2024 23:01:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date :Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=EZCATSrTvloVjbkKMEbSDOTA4ZTCzNep57DiW3EoUj0=; b=rYgignyst+4eUugIgKFCpcnliu qwACnerPzN4evBdtcyNh7yJcSZGYZtg1WX8EuNqO4Koe+s6ObaVaGKxCTcROkhywMOp8gIC+w+ybv +uSZ+ONftj/oXql/SSsM0fjJGtABRbYtbBT5LnrujnY0agdMs1xNV+FzbZVskicES8BaNCuMXOkge udFKnNt7iDqpZlIpxczSYAxOZ36w3eGj1mflZkgZVl6ApR0AnZc/M2LCsGh1Mno/1CVxJv+ovhCzw VIPBu7zuDHkp1SBjdTtoXiNCFkXUZh4Xq3291bsdeZtbw71GI9vgAgitfIlBs3lHUJWxSTd88MMTL ZJrq4knA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sz2A7-0000000EcGM-24li; Thu, 10 Oct 2024 23:01:39 +0000 Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([185.11.138.130]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1syziA-0000000EG4i-1SEb; Thu, 10 Oct 2024 20:24:39 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sntech.de; s=gloria202408; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=EZCATSrTvloVjbkKMEbSDOTA4ZTCzNep57DiW3EoUj0=; b=AOUaztwu1VEPoPcFH3OF+obr4I 3rkGPKWH+65SmtkocxtLd28D+UvXgrz3qssJf5si5mqGBrjU5SoUm5suDb7jZzZh9Ou7eAWX3IAVj gO6Q8Hze4QhYOfqXxnDcUEIi7ALpwm+oBt+/0QMgLtrXTJtCQ857F4nBr+25PMiUIZUw8PwVd0HGO WNBLuNC+Eu7UzMEdfHmbDnt8WMZTl6jlSx6goVonxi8OO/HhTi/h+a9xstLmG/y8LXljrhY71B3SK AJY7txpv+tDIW1CH3k9SQhMohB7/XQa2G9KyxTlXcAGjT81g+ATDPNN0cDdT2KM0lUDeuGtXvSypu wyyzlRfw==; Received: from i53875b34.versanet.de ([83.135.91.52] helo=diego.localnet) by gloria.sntech.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1syzi6-0000k3-G9; Thu, 10 Oct 2024 22:24:34 +0200 From: Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= To: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Dragan Simic Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add dtsi file for RK3399S SoC variant Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 22:24:33 +0200 Message-ID: <46729153.fMDQidcC6G@diego> In-Reply-To: <59c524a9a12465c21e01b779b42749fae148c41d.1728482151.git.dsimic@manjaro.org> References: <59c524a9a12465c21e01b779b42749fae148c41d.1728482151.git.dsimic@manjaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20241010_132438_442074_983EF247 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.51 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Dragan, Am Mittwoch, 9. Oktober 2024, 16:06:00 CEST schrieb Dragan Simic: > The way the introduced RK3399S SoC variant dtsi file (rk3399s.dtsi) is named > diverges from the way the two already present RK3399 SoC variant dtsi files > (rk3399-op1.dtsi and rk3399-t.dtsi) are named, but that simply follows the > commonly used and/or the official RK3399 SoC variant names. This is my only gripe with this ;-) . I.e. looking through simple google, the rk3399t also seems to be written without "-" most of the time. Though for me it would make the most sense to just go with "rk3399-s" here for some sort of clear style between -s -t and -op1 Heiko