From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 20:04:30 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] remoteproc: da8xx: don't select CMA on no-MMU
In-Reply-To: <CAK=WgbZ1c6=_MT0tb0X_E58ia=bSSGc5o_kHV_g0jJuDCtB5oA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1399560433-1402630-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de>
 <1399560990-1402858-18-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de>
 <CAK=WgbZ1c6=_MT0tb0X_E58ia=bSSGc5o_kHV_g0jJuDCtB5oA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4687391.ryfZfnW8rY@wuerfel>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Monday 12 May 2014 16:09:56 Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> 
> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > We can only use CMA on systems that have an MMU, because of
> > the requirement to use memory migration. NOMMU systems are
> > rather constrained to start with, but it seems reasonable
> > to assume that DMA allocations can still succeed in the
> > constrained case for remoteproc on NOMMU, so this patch
> > changes the da8xx implementation to not rely on CMA when
> > the MMU is disabled.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
> > Cc: Robert Tivy <rtivy@ti.com>
> > ---
> 
> Would you like me to pick this via the remoteproc tree or are you
> planning to route this set elsewhere anyway?

I'd prefer if you could pick it up into your tree.

	Arnd