linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
To: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Rohit Mathew <rohit.mathew@arm.com>,
	Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>,
	Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com>,
	Lecopzer Chen <lecopzerc@nvidia.com>,
	Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com,
	D Scott Phillips OS <scott@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	lcherian@marvell.com, bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com,
	tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
	Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@quicinc.com>,
	Xin Hao <xhao@linux.alibaba.com>,
	peternewman@google.com, dfustini@baylibre.com,
	amitsinght@marvell.com, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Rex Nie <rex.nie@jaguarmicro.com>,
	Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>, Koba Ko <kobak@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 20/36] arm_mpam: Probe the hardware features resctrl supports
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2025 09:56:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46e49e66-1da3-433c-bdad-9468133c78a2@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250711183648.30766-21-james.morse@arm.com>

Hi James,

On 7/11/25 19:36, James Morse wrote:
> Expand the probing support with the control and monitor types
> we can use with resctrl.
> 
> CC: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> ---
>   drivers/platform/arm64/mpam/mpam_devices.c  | 154 +++++++++++++++++++-
>   drivers/platform/arm64/mpam/mpam_internal.h |  53 +++++++
>   2 files changed, 206 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/arm64/mpam/mpam_devices.c b/drivers/platform/arm64/mpam/mpam_devices.c
> index 8646fb85ad09..61911831ab39 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/arm64/mpam/mpam_devices.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/arm64/mpam/mpam_devices.c
> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static LLIST_HEAD(mpam_garbage);
>   
>   static u32 __mpam_read_reg(struct mpam_msc *msc, u16 reg)
>   {
> -	WARN_ON_ONCE(reg > msc->mapped_hwpage_sz);
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(reg + sizeof(u32) > msc->mapped_hwpage_sz);
>   	WARN_ON_ONCE(!cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &msc->accessibility));
>   
>   	return readl_relaxed(msc->mapped_hwpage + reg);
> @@ -131,6 +131,20 @@ static inline void _mpam_write_partsel_reg(struct mpam_msc *msc, u16 reg, u32 va
>   }
>   #define mpam_write_partsel_reg(msc, reg, val)  _mpam_write_partsel_reg(msc, MPAMCFG_##reg, val)
>   
> +static inline u32 _mpam_read_monsel_reg(struct mpam_msc *msc, u16 reg)
> +{
> +	mpam_mon_sel_lock_held(msc);
> +	return __mpam_read_reg(msc, reg);
> +}
> +#define mpam_read_monsel_reg(msc, reg) _mpam_read_monsel_reg(msc, MSMON_##reg)
> +
> +static inline void _mpam_write_monsel_reg(struct mpam_msc *msc, u16 reg, u32 val)
> +{
> +	mpam_mon_sel_lock_held(msc);
> +	__mpam_write_reg(msc, reg, val);
> +}
> +#define mpam_write_monsel_reg(msc, reg, val)   _mpam_write_monsel_reg(msc, MSMON_##reg, val)
> +
>   static u64 mpam_msc_read_idr(struct mpam_msc *msc)
>   {
>   	u64 idr_high = 0, idr_low;
> @@ -645,6 +659,137 @@ static struct mpam_msc_ris *mpam_get_or_create_ris(struct mpam_msc *msc,
>   	return found;
>   }
>   
> +/*
> + * IHI009A.a has this nugget: "If a monitor does not support automatic behaviour
> + * of NRDY, software can use this bit for any purpose" - so hardware might not
> + * implement this - but it isn't RES0.
> + *
> + * Try and see what values stick in this bit. If we can write either value,
> + * its probably not implemented by hardware.
> + */
> +#define mpam_ris_hw_probe_hw_nrdy(_ris, _mon_reg, _result)			\
> +do {										\
> +	u32 now;								\
> +	u64 mon_sel;								\
> +	bool can_set, can_clear;						\
> +	struct mpam_msc *_msc = _ris->vmsc->msc;				\
> +										\
> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!mpam_mon_sel_inner_lock(_msc))) {			\
> +		_result = false;						\
> +		break;								\
> +	}									\
> +	mon_sel = FIELD_PREP(MSMON_CFG_MON_SEL_MON_SEL, 0) |			\
> +		  FIELD_PREP(MSMON_CFG_MON_SEL_RIS, _ris->ris_idx);		\
> +	mpam_write_monsel_reg(_msc, CFG_MON_SEL, mon_sel);			\
> +										\
> +	mpam_write_monsel_reg(_msc, _mon_reg, MSMON___NRDY);			\
> +	now = mpam_read_monsel_reg(_msc, _mon_reg);				\
> +	can_set = now & MSMON___NRDY;						\
> +										\
> +	mpam_write_monsel_reg(_msc, _mon_reg, 0);				\
> +	now = mpam_read_monsel_reg(_msc, _mon_reg);				\
> +	can_clear = !(now & MSMON___NRDY);					\
> +	mpam_mon_sel_inner_unlock(_msc);					\
> +										\
> +	_result = (!can_set || !can_clear);					\
> +} while (0)
> +
> +static void mpam_ris_hw_probe(struct mpam_msc_ris *ris)
> +{
> +	int err;
> +	struct mpam_msc *msc = ris->vmsc->msc;
> +	struct mpam_props *props = &ris->props;
> +
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&msc->probe_lock);
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&msc->part_sel_lock);
> +
> +	/* Cache Portion partitioning */
> +	if (FIELD_GET(MPAMF_IDR_HAS_CPOR_PART, ris->idr)) {
> +		u32 cpor_features = mpam_read_partsel_reg(msc, CPOR_IDR);
> +
> +		props->cpbm_wd = FIELD_GET(MPAMF_CPOR_IDR_CPBM_WD, cpor_features);
> +		if (props->cpbm_wd)
> +			mpam_set_feature(mpam_feat_cpor_part, props);
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Memory bandwidth partitioning */
> +	if (FIELD_GET(MPAMF_IDR_HAS_MBW_PART, ris->idr)) {
> +		u32 mbw_features = mpam_read_partsel_reg(msc, MBW_IDR);
> +
> +		/* portion bitmap resolution */
> +		props->mbw_pbm_bits = FIELD_GET(MPAMF_MBW_IDR_BWPBM_WD, mbw_features);
> +		if (props->mbw_pbm_bits &&
> +		    FIELD_GET(MPAMF_MBW_IDR_HAS_PBM, mbw_features))
> +			mpam_set_feature(mpam_feat_mbw_part, props);
> +
> +		props->bwa_wd = FIELD_GET(MPAMF_MBW_IDR_BWA_WD, mbw_features);
> +		if (props->bwa_wd && FIELD_GET(MPAMF_MBW_IDR_HAS_MAX, mbw_features))
> +			mpam_set_feature(mpam_feat_mbw_max, props);
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Performance Monitoring */
> +	if (FIELD_GET(MPAMF_IDR_HAS_MSMON, ris->idr)) {
> +		u32 msmon_features = mpam_read_partsel_reg(msc, MSMON_IDR);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * If the firmware max-nrdy-us property is missing, the
> +		 * CSU counters can't be used. Should we wait forever?
> +		 */
> +		err = device_property_read_u32(&msc->pdev->dev,
> +					       "arm,not-ready-us",
> +					       &msc->nrdy_usec);
> +
> +		if (FIELD_GET(MPAMF_MSMON_IDR_MSMON_CSU, msmon_features)) {
> +			u32 csumonidr;
> +
> +			csumonidr = mpam_read_partsel_reg(msc, CSUMON_IDR);
> +			props->num_csu_mon = FIELD_GET(MPAMF_CSUMON_IDR_NUM_MON, csumonidr);
> +			if (props->num_csu_mon) {
> +				bool hw_managed;
> +
> +				mpam_set_feature(mpam_feat_msmon_csu, props);
> +
> +				/* Is NRDY hardware managed? */
> +				mpam_mon_sel_outer_lock(msc);
> +				mpam_ris_hw_probe_hw_nrdy(ris, CSU, hw_managed);
> +				mpam_mon_sel_outer_unlock(msc);
> +				if (hw_managed)
> +					mpam_set_feature(mpam_feat_msmon_csu_hw_nrdy, props);
> +			}
> +
> +			/*
> +			 * Accept the missing firmware property if NRDY appears
> +			 * un-implemented.
> +			 */
> +			if (err && mpam_has_feature(mpam_feat_msmon_csu_hw_nrdy, props))
> +				pr_err_once("Counters are not usable because not-ready timeout was not provided by firmware.");
> +		}
> +		if (FIELD_GET(MPAMF_MSMON_IDR_MSMON_MBWU, msmon_features)) {
> +			bool hw_managed;
> +			u32 mbwumonidr = mpam_read_partsel_reg(msc, MBWUMON_IDR);
> +
> +			props->num_mbwu_mon = FIELD_GET(MPAMF_MBWUMON_IDR_NUM_MON, mbwumonidr);
> +			if (props->num_mbwu_mon)
> +				mpam_set_feature(mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu, props);
> +
> +			if (FIELD_GET(MPAMF_MBWUMON_IDR_HAS_RWBW, mbwumonidr))
> +				mpam_set_feature(mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_rwbw, props);
> +
> +			/* Is NRDY hardware managed? */
> +			mpam_mon_sel_outer_lock(msc);
> +			mpam_ris_hw_probe_hw_nrdy(ris, MBWU, hw_managed);
> +			mpam_mon_sel_outer_unlock(msc);
> +			if (hw_managed)
> +				mpam_set_feature(mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_hw_nrdy, props);
> +
> +			/*
> +			 * Don't warn about any missing firmware property for
> +			 * MBWU NRDY - it doesn't make any sense!
> +			 */
> +		}
> +	}
> +}
> +
>   static int mpam_msc_hw_probe(struct mpam_msc *msc)
>   {
>   	u64 idr;
> @@ -665,6 +810,7 @@ static int mpam_msc_hw_probe(struct mpam_msc *msc)
>   
>   	idr = mpam_msc_read_idr(msc);
>   	mutex_unlock(&msc->part_sel_lock);
> +
>   	msc->ris_max = FIELD_GET(MPAMF_IDR_RIS_MAX, idr);
>   
>   	/* Use these values so partid/pmg always starts with a valid value */
> @@ -685,6 +831,12 @@ static int mpam_msc_hw_probe(struct mpam_msc *msc)
>   		ris = mpam_get_or_create_ris(msc, ris_idx);
>   		if (IS_ERR(ris))
>   			return PTR_ERR(ris);
> +		ris->idr = idr;
> +
> +		mutex_lock(&msc->part_sel_lock);
> +		__mpam_part_sel(ris_idx, 0, msc);
> +		mpam_ris_hw_probe(ris);
> +		mutex_unlock(&msc->part_sel_lock);
>   	}
>   
>   	spin_lock(&partid_max_lock);
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/arm64/mpam/mpam_internal.h b/drivers/platform/arm64/mpam/mpam_internal.h
> index 42a454d5f914..ae6fd1f62cc4 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/arm64/mpam/mpam_internal.h
> +++ b/drivers/platform/arm64/mpam/mpam_internal.h
> @@ -136,6 +136,55 @@ static inline void mpam_mon_sel_lock_held(struct mpam_msc *msc)
>   		lockdep_assert_preemption_enabled();
>   }
>   
> +/*
> + * When we compact the supported features, we don't care what they are.
> + * Storing them as a bitmap makes life easy.
> + */
> +typedef u16 mpam_features_t;
> +
> +/* Bits for mpam_features_t */
> +enum mpam_device_features {
> +	mpam_feat_ccap_part = 0,
> +	mpam_feat_cpor_part,
> +	mpam_feat_mbw_part,
> +	mpam_feat_mbw_min,
> +	mpam_feat_mbw_max,
> +	mpam_feat_mbw_prop,
> +	mpam_feat_msmon,
> +	mpam_feat_msmon_csu,
> +	mpam_feat_msmon_csu_capture,
> +	mpam_feat_msmon_csu_hw_nrdy,
> +	mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu,
> +	mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_capture,
> +	mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_rwbw,
> +	mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_hw_nrdy,
> +	mpam_feat_msmon_capt,
> +	MPAM_FEATURE_LAST,
> +};
> +#define MPAM_ALL_FEATURES      ((1 << MPAM_FEATURE_LAST) - 1)

Consider a static assert to check the type is big enough.

static_assert(BITS_PER_TYPE(mpam_features_t) >= MPAM_FEATURE_LAST);

> +
> +struct mpam_props {
> +	mpam_features_t		features;
> +
> +	u16			cpbm_wd;
> +	u16			mbw_pbm_bits;
> +	u16			bwa_wd;
> +	u16			num_csu_mon;
> +	u16			num_mbwu_mon;
> +};
> +
> +static inline bool mpam_has_feature(enum mpam_device_features feat,
> +				    struct mpam_props *props)
> +{
> +	return (1 << feat) & props->features;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void mpam_set_feature(enum mpam_device_features feat,
> +				    struct mpam_props *props)
> +{
> +	props->features |= (1 << feat);
> +}
> +
>   struct mpam_class {
>   	/* mpam_components in this class */
>   	struct list_head	components;
> @@ -175,6 +224,8 @@ struct mpam_vmsc {
>   	/* mpam_msc_ris in this vmsc */
>   	struct list_head	ris;
>   
> +	struct mpam_props	props;
> +
>   	/* All RIS in this vMSC are members of this MSC */
>   	struct mpam_msc		*msc;
>   
> @@ -186,6 +237,8 @@ struct mpam_vmsc {
>   
>   struct mpam_msc_ris {
>   	u8			ris_idx;
> +	u64			idr;
> +	struct mpam_props	props;
>   
>   	cpumask_t		affinity;
>   

Thanks,

Ben



  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-07-28  9:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 117+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-11 18:36 [RFC PATCH 00/36] arm_mpam: Add basic mpam driver James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 01/36] cacheinfo: Set cache 'id' based on DT data James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 02/36] cacheinfo: Add arch hook to compress CPU h/w id into 32 bits for cache-id James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 03/36] arm64: cacheinfo: Provide helper to compress MPIDR value into u32 James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 04/36] cacheinfo: Expose the code to generate a cache-id from a device_node James Morse
2025-07-14 11:40   ` Ben Horgan
2025-07-25 17:08     ` James Morse
2025-07-28  8:37       ` Ben Horgan
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 05/36] ACPI / PPTT: Add a helper to fill a cpumask from a processor container James Morse
2025-07-17  7:58   ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2025-07-25 17:06     ` James Morse
2025-07-22 14:28   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-25 17:05     ` James Morse
2025-07-23 14:42   ` Ben Horgan
2025-07-25 17:05     ` James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 06/36] ACPI / PPTT: Stop acpi_count_levels() expecting callers to clear levels James Morse
2025-07-16 15:51   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-25 17:05     ` James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 07/36] ACPI / PPTT: Find cache level by cache-id James Morse
2025-07-14 11:42   ` Ben Horgan
2025-08-05 17:06     ` James Morse
2025-07-16 16:21   ` [RFC PATCH 07/36] ACPI / PPTT: Find cache level by cache-idUIRE Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-05 17:06     ` [RFC PATCH 07/36] ACPI / PPTT: Find cache level by cache-id James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 08/36] ACPI / PPTT: Add a helper to fill a cpumask from a cache_id James Morse
2025-07-16 16:24   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-05 17:06     ` James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 09/36] arm64: kconfig: Add Kconfig entry for MPAM James Morse
2025-07-16 16:26   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 10/36] ACPI / MPAM: Parse the MPAM table James Morse
2025-07-16 17:07   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-23 16:39     ` Ben Horgan
2025-08-05 17:07       ` James Morse
2025-08-15  9:33         ` Ben Horgan
2025-07-28 10:08     ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-05 17:08       ` James Morse
2025-08-05 17:07     ` James Morse
2025-07-24 10:50   ` Ben Horgan
2025-08-05 17:08     ` James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 11/36] dt-bindings: arm: Add MPAM MSC binding James Morse
2025-07-11 21:43   ` Rob Herring
2025-08-05 17:08     ` James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 12/36] platform: arm64: Move ec devices to an ec subdirectory James Morse
2025-07-21 16:32   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-06 18:03     ` James Morse
2025-07-24 10:56   ` Ben Horgan
2025-08-06 18:03     ` James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 13/36] arm_mpam: Add probe/remove for mpam msc driver and kbuild boiler plate James Morse
2025-07-24 11:02   ` Ben Horgan
2025-08-06 18:03     ` James Morse
2025-07-24 12:09   ` Catalin Marinas
2025-08-06 18:04     ` James Morse
2025-08-07 17:50       ` Drew Fustini
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 14/36] arm_mpam: Add support for memory controller MSC on DT platforms James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 15/36] arm_mpam: Add the class and component structures for ris firmware described James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 16/36] arm_mpam: Add MPAM MSC register layout definitions James Morse
2025-07-17  1:04   ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2025-08-06 18:04     ` James Morse
2025-07-24 14:02   ` Ben Horgan
2025-08-06 18:05     ` James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 17/36] arm_mpam: Add cpuhp callbacks to probe MSC hardware James Morse
2025-07-24 14:13   ` Ben Horgan
2025-08-06 18:07     ` James Morse
2025-07-29  6:11   ` Baisheng Gao
2025-08-06 18:07     ` James Morse
2025-08-05  8:46   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 18/36] arm_mpam: Probe MSCs to find the supported partid/pmg values James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 19/36] arm_mpam: Add helpers for managing the locking around the mon_sel registers James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 20/36] arm_mpam: Probe the hardware features resctrl supports James Morse
2025-07-24 15:08   ` Ben Horgan
2025-07-28 16:16     ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-07 18:26     ` James Morse
2025-07-28  8:56   ` Ben Horgan [this message]
2025-08-08  7:20     ` James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 21/36] arm_mpam: Merge supported features during mpam_enable() into mpam_class James Morse
2025-07-28  9:15   ` Ben Horgan
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 22/36] arm_mpam: Reset MSC controls from cpu hp callbacks James Morse
2025-07-28  9:49   ` Ben Horgan
2025-08-08  7:05     ` James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 23/36] arm_mpam: Add a helper to touch an MSC from any CPU James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 24/36] arm_mpam: Extend reset logic to allow devices to be reset any time James Morse
2025-07-28 10:22   ` Ben Horgan
2025-08-08  7:07     ` James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 25/36] arm_mpam: Register and enable IRQs James Morse
2025-07-16  7:31   ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2025-08-08  7:08     ` James Morse
2025-07-17  1:08   ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2025-08-08  7:07     ` James Morse
2025-07-22 15:06   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-08  7:11     ` James Morse
2025-07-28 10:49   ` Ben Horgan
2025-08-08  7:11     ` James Morse
2025-08-04 16:53   ` Fenghua Yu
2025-08-08  7:12     ` James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 26/36] arm_mpam: Use a static key to indicate when mpam is enabled James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 27/36] arm_mpam: Allow configuration to be applied and restored during cpu online James Morse
2025-07-16  6:49   ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2025-08-08  7:13     ` James Morse
2025-07-28 11:59   ` Ben Horgan
2025-07-28 15:34     ` Dave Martin
2025-08-08  7:16       ` James Morse
2025-08-08  7:14     ` James Morse
2025-08-04 16:39   ` Fenghua Yu
2025-08-08  7:17     ` James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 28/36] arm_mpam: Probe and reset the rest of the features James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 29/36] arm_mpam: Add helpers to allocate monitors James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 30/36] arm_mpam: Add mpam_msmon_read() to read monitor value James Morse
2025-07-28 13:02   ` Ben Horgan
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 31/36] arm_mpam: Track bandwidth counter state for overflow and power management James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 32/36] arm_mpam: Probe for long/lwd mbwu counters James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 33/36] arm_mpam: Use long MBWU counters if supported James Morse
2025-07-28 13:46   ` Ben Horgan
2025-08-08  7:19     ` James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 34/36] arm_mpam: Add helper to reset saved mbwu state James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 35/36] arm_mpam: Add kunit test for bitmap reset James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 36/36] arm_mpam: Add kunit tests for props_mismatch() James Morse
2025-08-01 16:09 ` [RFC PATCH 00/36] arm_mpam: Add basic mpam driver Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-08  7:23   ` James Morse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46e49e66-1da3-433c-bdad-9468133c78a2@arm.com \
    --to=ben.horgan@arm.com \
    --cc=amitsinght@marvell.com \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com \
    --cc=carl@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=dave.martin@arm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dfustini@baylibre.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kobak@nvidia.com \
    --cc=lcherian@marvell.com \
    --cc=lecopzerc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peternewman@google.com \
    --cc=quic_jiles@quicinc.com \
    --cc=rex.nie@jaguarmicro.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=rohit.mathew@arm.com \
    --cc=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
    --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=xhao@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=zengheng4@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).