From: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
To: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Rohit Mathew <rohit.mathew@arm.com>,
Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>,
Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com>,
Lecopzer Chen <lecopzerc@nvidia.com>,
Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com>,
shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com,
D Scott Phillips OS <scott@os.amperecomputing.com>,
lcherian@marvell.com, bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com,
tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@quicinc.com>,
Xin Hao <xhao@linux.alibaba.com>,
peternewman@google.com, dfustini@baylibre.com,
amitsinght@marvell.com, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Rex Nie <rex.nie@jaguarmicro.com>,
Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>, Koba Ko <kobak@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 20/36] arm_mpam: Probe the hardware features resctrl supports
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2025 09:56:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46e49e66-1da3-433c-bdad-9468133c78a2@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250711183648.30766-21-james.morse@arm.com>
Hi James,
On 7/11/25 19:36, James Morse wrote:
> Expand the probing support with the control and monitor types
> we can use with resctrl.
>
> CC: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/platform/arm64/mpam/mpam_devices.c | 154 +++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/platform/arm64/mpam/mpam_internal.h | 53 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 206 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/arm64/mpam/mpam_devices.c b/drivers/platform/arm64/mpam/mpam_devices.c
> index 8646fb85ad09..61911831ab39 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/arm64/mpam/mpam_devices.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/arm64/mpam/mpam_devices.c
> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static LLIST_HEAD(mpam_garbage);
>
> static u32 __mpam_read_reg(struct mpam_msc *msc, u16 reg)
> {
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(reg > msc->mapped_hwpage_sz);
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(reg + sizeof(u32) > msc->mapped_hwpage_sz);
> WARN_ON_ONCE(!cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &msc->accessibility));
>
> return readl_relaxed(msc->mapped_hwpage + reg);
> @@ -131,6 +131,20 @@ static inline void _mpam_write_partsel_reg(struct mpam_msc *msc, u16 reg, u32 va
> }
> #define mpam_write_partsel_reg(msc, reg, val) _mpam_write_partsel_reg(msc, MPAMCFG_##reg, val)
>
> +static inline u32 _mpam_read_monsel_reg(struct mpam_msc *msc, u16 reg)
> +{
> + mpam_mon_sel_lock_held(msc);
> + return __mpam_read_reg(msc, reg);
> +}
> +#define mpam_read_monsel_reg(msc, reg) _mpam_read_monsel_reg(msc, MSMON_##reg)
> +
> +static inline void _mpam_write_monsel_reg(struct mpam_msc *msc, u16 reg, u32 val)
> +{
> + mpam_mon_sel_lock_held(msc);
> + __mpam_write_reg(msc, reg, val);
> +}
> +#define mpam_write_monsel_reg(msc, reg, val) _mpam_write_monsel_reg(msc, MSMON_##reg, val)
> +
> static u64 mpam_msc_read_idr(struct mpam_msc *msc)
> {
> u64 idr_high = 0, idr_low;
> @@ -645,6 +659,137 @@ static struct mpam_msc_ris *mpam_get_or_create_ris(struct mpam_msc *msc,
> return found;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * IHI009A.a has this nugget: "If a monitor does not support automatic behaviour
> + * of NRDY, software can use this bit for any purpose" - so hardware might not
> + * implement this - but it isn't RES0.
> + *
> + * Try and see what values stick in this bit. If we can write either value,
> + * its probably not implemented by hardware.
> + */
> +#define mpam_ris_hw_probe_hw_nrdy(_ris, _mon_reg, _result) \
> +do { \
> + u32 now; \
> + u64 mon_sel; \
> + bool can_set, can_clear; \
> + struct mpam_msc *_msc = _ris->vmsc->msc; \
> + \
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!mpam_mon_sel_inner_lock(_msc))) { \
> + _result = false; \
> + break; \
> + } \
> + mon_sel = FIELD_PREP(MSMON_CFG_MON_SEL_MON_SEL, 0) | \
> + FIELD_PREP(MSMON_CFG_MON_SEL_RIS, _ris->ris_idx); \
> + mpam_write_monsel_reg(_msc, CFG_MON_SEL, mon_sel); \
> + \
> + mpam_write_monsel_reg(_msc, _mon_reg, MSMON___NRDY); \
> + now = mpam_read_monsel_reg(_msc, _mon_reg); \
> + can_set = now & MSMON___NRDY; \
> + \
> + mpam_write_monsel_reg(_msc, _mon_reg, 0); \
> + now = mpam_read_monsel_reg(_msc, _mon_reg); \
> + can_clear = !(now & MSMON___NRDY); \
> + mpam_mon_sel_inner_unlock(_msc); \
> + \
> + _result = (!can_set || !can_clear); \
> +} while (0)
> +
> +static void mpam_ris_hw_probe(struct mpam_msc_ris *ris)
> +{
> + int err;
> + struct mpam_msc *msc = ris->vmsc->msc;
> + struct mpam_props *props = &ris->props;
> +
> + lockdep_assert_held(&msc->probe_lock);
> + lockdep_assert_held(&msc->part_sel_lock);
> +
> + /* Cache Portion partitioning */
> + if (FIELD_GET(MPAMF_IDR_HAS_CPOR_PART, ris->idr)) {
> + u32 cpor_features = mpam_read_partsel_reg(msc, CPOR_IDR);
> +
> + props->cpbm_wd = FIELD_GET(MPAMF_CPOR_IDR_CPBM_WD, cpor_features);
> + if (props->cpbm_wd)
> + mpam_set_feature(mpam_feat_cpor_part, props);
> + }
> +
> + /* Memory bandwidth partitioning */
> + if (FIELD_GET(MPAMF_IDR_HAS_MBW_PART, ris->idr)) {
> + u32 mbw_features = mpam_read_partsel_reg(msc, MBW_IDR);
> +
> + /* portion bitmap resolution */
> + props->mbw_pbm_bits = FIELD_GET(MPAMF_MBW_IDR_BWPBM_WD, mbw_features);
> + if (props->mbw_pbm_bits &&
> + FIELD_GET(MPAMF_MBW_IDR_HAS_PBM, mbw_features))
> + mpam_set_feature(mpam_feat_mbw_part, props);
> +
> + props->bwa_wd = FIELD_GET(MPAMF_MBW_IDR_BWA_WD, mbw_features);
> + if (props->bwa_wd && FIELD_GET(MPAMF_MBW_IDR_HAS_MAX, mbw_features))
> + mpam_set_feature(mpam_feat_mbw_max, props);
> + }
> +
> + /* Performance Monitoring */
> + if (FIELD_GET(MPAMF_IDR_HAS_MSMON, ris->idr)) {
> + u32 msmon_features = mpam_read_partsel_reg(msc, MSMON_IDR);
> +
> + /*
> + * If the firmware max-nrdy-us property is missing, the
> + * CSU counters can't be used. Should we wait forever?
> + */
> + err = device_property_read_u32(&msc->pdev->dev,
> + "arm,not-ready-us",
> + &msc->nrdy_usec);
> +
> + if (FIELD_GET(MPAMF_MSMON_IDR_MSMON_CSU, msmon_features)) {
> + u32 csumonidr;
> +
> + csumonidr = mpam_read_partsel_reg(msc, CSUMON_IDR);
> + props->num_csu_mon = FIELD_GET(MPAMF_CSUMON_IDR_NUM_MON, csumonidr);
> + if (props->num_csu_mon) {
> + bool hw_managed;
> +
> + mpam_set_feature(mpam_feat_msmon_csu, props);
> +
> + /* Is NRDY hardware managed? */
> + mpam_mon_sel_outer_lock(msc);
> + mpam_ris_hw_probe_hw_nrdy(ris, CSU, hw_managed);
> + mpam_mon_sel_outer_unlock(msc);
> + if (hw_managed)
> + mpam_set_feature(mpam_feat_msmon_csu_hw_nrdy, props);
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Accept the missing firmware property if NRDY appears
> + * un-implemented.
> + */
> + if (err && mpam_has_feature(mpam_feat_msmon_csu_hw_nrdy, props))
> + pr_err_once("Counters are not usable because not-ready timeout was not provided by firmware.");
> + }
> + if (FIELD_GET(MPAMF_MSMON_IDR_MSMON_MBWU, msmon_features)) {
> + bool hw_managed;
> + u32 mbwumonidr = mpam_read_partsel_reg(msc, MBWUMON_IDR);
> +
> + props->num_mbwu_mon = FIELD_GET(MPAMF_MBWUMON_IDR_NUM_MON, mbwumonidr);
> + if (props->num_mbwu_mon)
> + mpam_set_feature(mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu, props);
> +
> + if (FIELD_GET(MPAMF_MBWUMON_IDR_HAS_RWBW, mbwumonidr))
> + mpam_set_feature(mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_rwbw, props);
> +
> + /* Is NRDY hardware managed? */
> + mpam_mon_sel_outer_lock(msc);
> + mpam_ris_hw_probe_hw_nrdy(ris, MBWU, hw_managed);
> + mpam_mon_sel_outer_unlock(msc);
> + if (hw_managed)
> + mpam_set_feature(mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_hw_nrdy, props);
> +
> + /*
> + * Don't warn about any missing firmware property for
> + * MBWU NRDY - it doesn't make any sense!
> + */
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> static int mpam_msc_hw_probe(struct mpam_msc *msc)
> {
> u64 idr;
> @@ -665,6 +810,7 @@ static int mpam_msc_hw_probe(struct mpam_msc *msc)
>
> idr = mpam_msc_read_idr(msc);
> mutex_unlock(&msc->part_sel_lock);
> +
> msc->ris_max = FIELD_GET(MPAMF_IDR_RIS_MAX, idr);
>
> /* Use these values so partid/pmg always starts with a valid value */
> @@ -685,6 +831,12 @@ static int mpam_msc_hw_probe(struct mpam_msc *msc)
> ris = mpam_get_or_create_ris(msc, ris_idx);
> if (IS_ERR(ris))
> return PTR_ERR(ris);
> + ris->idr = idr;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&msc->part_sel_lock);
> + __mpam_part_sel(ris_idx, 0, msc);
> + mpam_ris_hw_probe(ris);
> + mutex_unlock(&msc->part_sel_lock);
> }
>
> spin_lock(&partid_max_lock);
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/arm64/mpam/mpam_internal.h b/drivers/platform/arm64/mpam/mpam_internal.h
> index 42a454d5f914..ae6fd1f62cc4 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/arm64/mpam/mpam_internal.h
> +++ b/drivers/platform/arm64/mpam/mpam_internal.h
> @@ -136,6 +136,55 @@ static inline void mpam_mon_sel_lock_held(struct mpam_msc *msc)
> lockdep_assert_preemption_enabled();
> }
>
> +/*
> + * When we compact the supported features, we don't care what they are.
> + * Storing them as a bitmap makes life easy.
> + */
> +typedef u16 mpam_features_t;
> +
> +/* Bits for mpam_features_t */
> +enum mpam_device_features {
> + mpam_feat_ccap_part = 0,
> + mpam_feat_cpor_part,
> + mpam_feat_mbw_part,
> + mpam_feat_mbw_min,
> + mpam_feat_mbw_max,
> + mpam_feat_mbw_prop,
> + mpam_feat_msmon,
> + mpam_feat_msmon_csu,
> + mpam_feat_msmon_csu_capture,
> + mpam_feat_msmon_csu_hw_nrdy,
> + mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu,
> + mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_capture,
> + mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_rwbw,
> + mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_hw_nrdy,
> + mpam_feat_msmon_capt,
> + MPAM_FEATURE_LAST,
> +};
> +#define MPAM_ALL_FEATURES ((1 << MPAM_FEATURE_LAST) - 1)
Consider a static assert to check the type is big enough.
static_assert(BITS_PER_TYPE(mpam_features_t) >= MPAM_FEATURE_LAST);
> +
> +struct mpam_props {
> + mpam_features_t features;
> +
> + u16 cpbm_wd;
> + u16 mbw_pbm_bits;
> + u16 bwa_wd;
> + u16 num_csu_mon;
> + u16 num_mbwu_mon;
> +};
> +
> +static inline bool mpam_has_feature(enum mpam_device_features feat,
> + struct mpam_props *props)
> +{
> + return (1 << feat) & props->features;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void mpam_set_feature(enum mpam_device_features feat,
> + struct mpam_props *props)
> +{
> + props->features |= (1 << feat);
> +}
> +
> struct mpam_class {
> /* mpam_components in this class */
> struct list_head components;
> @@ -175,6 +224,8 @@ struct mpam_vmsc {
> /* mpam_msc_ris in this vmsc */
> struct list_head ris;
>
> + struct mpam_props props;
> +
> /* All RIS in this vMSC are members of this MSC */
> struct mpam_msc *msc;
>
> @@ -186,6 +237,8 @@ struct mpam_vmsc {
>
> struct mpam_msc_ris {
> u8 ris_idx;
> + u64 idr;
> + struct mpam_props props;
>
> cpumask_t affinity;
>
Thanks,
Ben
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-28 9:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 117+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-11 18:36 [RFC PATCH 00/36] arm_mpam: Add basic mpam driver James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 01/36] cacheinfo: Set cache 'id' based on DT data James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 02/36] cacheinfo: Add arch hook to compress CPU h/w id into 32 bits for cache-id James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 03/36] arm64: cacheinfo: Provide helper to compress MPIDR value into u32 James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 04/36] cacheinfo: Expose the code to generate a cache-id from a device_node James Morse
2025-07-14 11:40 ` Ben Horgan
2025-07-25 17:08 ` James Morse
2025-07-28 8:37 ` Ben Horgan
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 05/36] ACPI / PPTT: Add a helper to fill a cpumask from a processor container James Morse
2025-07-17 7:58 ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2025-07-25 17:06 ` James Morse
2025-07-22 14:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-25 17:05 ` James Morse
2025-07-23 14:42 ` Ben Horgan
2025-07-25 17:05 ` James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 06/36] ACPI / PPTT: Stop acpi_count_levels() expecting callers to clear levels James Morse
2025-07-16 15:51 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-25 17:05 ` James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 07/36] ACPI / PPTT: Find cache level by cache-id James Morse
2025-07-14 11:42 ` Ben Horgan
2025-08-05 17:06 ` James Morse
2025-07-16 16:21 ` [RFC PATCH 07/36] ACPI / PPTT: Find cache level by cache-idUIRE Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-05 17:06 ` [RFC PATCH 07/36] ACPI / PPTT: Find cache level by cache-id James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 08/36] ACPI / PPTT: Add a helper to fill a cpumask from a cache_id James Morse
2025-07-16 16:24 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-05 17:06 ` James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 09/36] arm64: kconfig: Add Kconfig entry for MPAM James Morse
2025-07-16 16:26 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 10/36] ACPI / MPAM: Parse the MPAM table James Morse
2025-07-16 17:07 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-23 16:39 ` Ben Horgan
2025-08-05 17:07 ` James Morse
2025-08-15 9:33 ` Ben Horgan
2025-07-28 10:08 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-05 17:08 ` James Morse
2025-08-05 17:07 ` James Morse
2025-07-24 10:50 ` Ben Horgan
2025-08-05 17:08 ` James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 11/36] dt-bindings: arm: Add MPAM MSC binding James Morse
2025-07-11 21:43 ` Rob Herring
2025-08-05 17:08 ` James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 12/36] platform: arm64: Move ec devices to an ec subdirectory James Morse
2025-07-21 16:32 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-06 18:03 ` James Morse
2025-07-24 10:56 ` Ben Horgan
2025-08-06 18:03 ` James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 13/36] arm_mpam: Add probe/remove for mpam msc driver and kbuild boiler plate James Morse
2025-07-24 11:02 ` Ben Horgan
2025-08-06 18:03 ` James Morse
2025-07-24 12:09 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-08-06 18:04 ` James Morse
2025-08-07 17:50 ` Drew Fustini
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 14/36] arm_mpam: Add support for memory controller MSC on DT platforms James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 15/36] arm_mpam: Add the class and component structures for ris firmware described James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 16/36] arm_mpam: Add MPAM MSC register layout definitions James Morse
2025-07-17 1:04 ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2025-08-06 18:04 ` James Morse
2025-07-24 14:02 ` Ben Horgan
2025-08-06 18:05 ` James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 17/36] arm_mpam: Add cpuhp callbacks to probe MSC hardware James Morse
2025-07-24 14:13 ` Ben Horgan
2025-08-06 18:07 ` James Morse
2025-07-29 6:11 ` Baisheng Gao
2025-08-06 18:07 ` James Morse
2025-08-05 8:46 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 18/36] arm_mpam: Probe MSCs to find the supported partid/pmg values James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 19/36] arm_mpam: Add helpers for managing the locking around the mon_sel registers James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 20/36] arm_mpam: Probe the hardware features resctrl supports James Morse
2025-07-24 15:08 ` Ben Horgan
2025-07-28 16:16 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-07 18:26 ` James Morse
2025-07-28 8:56 ` Ben Horgan [this message]
2025-08-08 7:20 ` James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 21/36] arm_mpam: Merge supported features during mpam_enable() into mpam_class James Morse
2025-07-28 9:15 ` Ben Horgan
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 22/36] arm_mpam: Reset MSC controls from cpu hp callbacks James Morse
2025-07-28 9:49 ` Ben Horgan
2025-08-08 7:05 ` James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 23/36] arm_mpam: Add a helper to touch an MSC from any CPU James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 24/36] arm_mpam: Extend reset logic to allow devices to be reset any time James Morse
2025-07-28 10:22 ` Ben Horgan
2025-08-08 7:07 ` James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 25/36] arm_mpam: Register and enable IRQs James Morse
2025-07-16 7:31 ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2025-08-08 7:08 ` James Morse
2025-07-17 1:08 ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2025-08-08 7:07 ` James Morse
2025-07-22 15:06 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-08 7:11 ` James Morse
2025-07-28 10:49 ` Ben Horgan
2025-08-08 7:11 ` James Morse
2025-08-04 16:53 ` Fenghua Yu
2025-08-08 7:12 ` James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 26/36] arm_mpam: Use a static key to indicate when mpam is enabled James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 27/36] arm_mpam: Allow configuration to be applied and restored during cpu online James Morse
2025-07-16 6:49 ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2025-08-08 7:13 ` James Morse
2025-07-28 11:59 ` Ben Horgan
2025-07-28 15:34 ` Dave Martin
2025-08-08 7:16 ` James Morse
2025-08-08 7:14 ` James Morse
2025-08-04 16:39 ` Fenghua Yu
2025-08-08 7:17 ` James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 28/36] arm_mpam: Probe and reset the rest of the features James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 29/36] arm_mpam: Add helpers to allocate monitors James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 30/36] arm_mpam: Add mpam_msmon_read() to read monitor value James Morse
2025-07-28 13:02 ` Ben Horgan
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 31/36] arm_mpam: Track bandwidth counter state for overflow and power management James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 32/36] arm_mpam: Probe for long/lwd mbwu counters James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 33/36] arm_mpam: Use long MBWU counters if supported James Morse
2025-07-28 13:46 ` Ben Horgan
2025-08-08 7:19 ` James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 34/36] arm_mpam: Add helper to reset saved mbwu state James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 35/36] arm_mpam: Add kunit test for bitmap reset James Morse
2025-07-11 18:36 ` [RFC PATCH 36/36] arm_mpam: Add kunit tests for props_mismatch() James Morse
2025-08-01 16:09 ` [RFC PATCH 00/36] arm_mpam: Add basic mpam driver Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-08 7:23 ` James Morse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46e49e66-1da3-433c-bdad-9468133c78a2@arm.com \
--to=ben.horgan@arm.com \
--cc=amitsinght@marvell.com \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com \
--cc=carl@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=dave.martin@arm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dfustini@baylibre.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kobak@nvidia.com \
--cc=lcherian@marvell.com \
--cc=lecopzerc@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peternewman@google.com \
--cc=quic_jiles@quicinc.com \
--cc=rex.nie@jaguarmicro.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=rohit.mathew@arm.com \
--cc=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
--cc=xhao@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=zengheng4@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).