From: Olivier MOYSAN <olivier.moysan@foss.st.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
Cc: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@kernel.org>,
"David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
"Maxime Coquelin" <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
"Alexandre Torgue" <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: stm32-dfsdm: Treat flags as booleans
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 11:43:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46fce99d-9dd5-435b-95cd-86ed4771aa83@foss.st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260621151026.69714694@jic23-huawei>
Hi Andy, Jonathan,
Sorry for the late answer.
On 6/21/26 16:10, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Jun 2026 16:39:16 +0300
> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 12, 2026 at 04:51:50PM -0500, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
>>> The "st,adc-alt-channel" and "st,filter0-sync" properties are
>>> documented as boolean flags. The legacy parser read them as integer
>>> cells, unlike the child-node parser which already checks only for
>>> presence.
>>>
>>> Use presence and boolean helpers so both parsers follow the binding and
>>> the property type checker no longer reports the flags.
>>
>> For the patch
>> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
>>
>> However one interesting remark below.
>>
>> ...
>>
>>> - ret = of_property_read_u32_index(indio_dev->dev.of_node,
>>> - "st,adc-alt-channel", chan_idx,
>>> - &df_ch->alt_si);
>>
>>> + df_ch->alt_si = of_property_present(indio_dev->dev.of_node,
>>
>> I believe it still has another (serious?) issue. We usually don't use indio_dev
>> for device properties. It's not a device that is described in DT.
>> It seems the only driver in IIO that does that. Note, I haven't conducted any
>> deeper research, it might be (however I'm quite in doubt) that this is correct
>> use and one device registers a few indio_dev:s.
>
> It is curious. The registration sequence in this driver is complex, but I'm not
> seeing anything that sets the fwnode for the struct iio_dev->dev before calling
> the init() callbacks that end up in this code. It is set later by iio_device_register()
> (iirc that has something to do with consumers turning up later).
>
> St folk could you take a look at this and see what we are missing
> if it does currently work?
>
> For now I'll apply this patch but might need to drop it if a fix clashes
> with it.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jonathan
>
>
I confirm that the current legacy path is functional
(With the st,adc-alt-channel property fix applied)
It currently works because the driver initializes np from dev->of_node
in probe, and that value is then used in init callbacks.
I agree that this approach is not robust, as it depends on
initialization sequencing and on using an IIO object that is not the DT
owner object. I will prepare a patch to use the DT device directly as
the single source for DT properties.
I also suggest keeping a fallback path for st,adc-alt-channel so we do
not break legacy DTs that have not yet migrated to the new binding.
I prepare this also.
BRs
Olivier
>
>>
>>> + "st,adc-alt-channel");
>>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-23 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-12 21:51 [PATCH] iio: stm32-dfsdm: Treat flags as booleans Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-06-13 13:39 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-06-21 14:10 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-06-23 9:43 ` Olivier MOYSAN [this message]
2026-06-23 9:54 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46fce99d-9dd5-435b-95cd-86ed4771aa83@foss.st.com \
--to=olivier.moysan@foss.st.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox