From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com (Laurent Pinchart) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 12:35:42 +0300 Subject: [PATCH v2 0/8] drm/bridge: add bus flag support In-Reply-To: References: <20180912183222.25414-1-stefan@agner.ch> Message-ID: <4703489.BS6gAglWfc@avalon> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello, On Friday, 14 September 2018 12:07:03 EEST Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 8:32 PM Stefan Agner wrote: > > @Linus Walleij, Laurent Pinchart: Since you have been involved in > > the initial bus timings discussion, I would like to have your Ack > > on at least patch 2/3... If we want to keep the setup/hold timings, > > the patchset should also work without those two patches. > > AFAICT this ends up with the PL111 code identical to what I > proposed in my first patch set to support the latching properly, > so I am pretty much happy as long as my hardware does not > flicker. (Rough consensus and running code.) I'm not very invested > in either idea to represent these timings, so > Acked-by: Linus Walleij I've just replied to patch 3/8 with an explanation of why we have added this particular API, and why we need to keep it. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart