From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 09:31:12 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v2 2/5] ARM: dts: vfxxx: Add device tree node for OCOTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4759698.elnRBldlxl@wuerfel> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Monday 02 May 2016 12:35:01 Sanchayan Maity wrote: > + ocotp at 400a5000 { > + compatible = "fsl,vf610-ocotp"; > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <1>; > + reg = <0x400a5000 0xCF0>; > + clocks = <&clks VF610_CLK_OCOTP>; > + > + ocotp_cfg0: cfg0 at 410 { > + reg = <0x410 0x4>; > + }; > + > + ocotp_cfg1: cfg1 at 420 { > + reg = <0x420 0x4>; > + }; > + }; How do the registers of the child nodes relate to the registers of the parent? If there are in the same address space, it might be good to add a "ranges" property to describe it. Arnd -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Gavin Shan Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 40/45] drivers/of: Split unflatten_dt_node() Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 12:02:21 +1000 Size: 8869 URL: