From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 10:04:21 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: ux500: fix prcmu_is_cpu_in_wfi() calculation
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdb1RdDCjT3ChiJdF8WZHp-Sb1un1tvSOh3uShZn2DaZ-Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20161116152047.3336967-1-arnd@arndb.de>
 <CACRpkdb1RdDCjT3ChiJdF8WZHp-Sb1un1tvSOh3uShZn2DaZ-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4774803.kQO20ucMKM@wuerfel>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Tuesday, November 22, 2016 9:47:20 AM CET Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> 
> > This function clearly never worked and always returns true,
> > as pointed out by gcc-7:
> >
> > arch/arm/mach-ux500/pm.c: In function 'prcmu_is_cpu_in_wfi':
> > arch/arm/mach-ux500/pm.c:137:212: error: ?: using integer constants in boolean context, the expression will always evaluate to 'true' [-Werror=int-in-bool-context]
> >
> > With the added braces, the condition actually makes sense.
> >
> > Fixes: 34fe6f107eab ("mfd : Check if the other db8500 core is in WFI")
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> 
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> 
> Will you apply it directly to ARM SoC or should I queue it and
> send it with a pull request?

I'd prefer you to queue and track it, thanks,

	Arnd