From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: heiko@sntech.de (Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?=)
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 12:11:11 +0200
Subject: [PATCH v4 4/6] arm64: dts: rockchip: add core dtsi file for
 RK3328 SoCs
In-Reply-To: <58E4516D.4000805@rock-chips.com>
References: <1490607650-18650-1-git-send-email-cl@rock-chips.com>
 <6636047.jL6XHNkknt@phil> <58E4516D.4000805@rock-chips.com>
Message-ID: <4811905.ImQG7774i7@diego>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi Elaine,

Am Mittwoch, 5. April 2017, 10:07:41 CEST schrieb Elaine Zhang:
> On 04/05/2017 12:04 AM, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > Am Montag, 27. M?rz 2017, 17:40:48 CEST schrieb cl at rock-chips.com:
> >> From: Liang Chen <cl@rock-chips.com>
> >> 
> >> This patch adds core dtsi file for Rockchip RK3328 SoCs.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Liang Chen <cl@rock-chips.com>
> > 
> > applied for 4.12, with the following list of changes:
> > 
> > - reorder some properties to bring them in alphabetical order
> > - dropped the status-disabled from the power-controller
> > 
> >    power-domain control is a quite essential part of the system, so if
> >    boards really want to disable them, they should do it in their board
> >    file
> >    Having power-domains on all the time, is also our default in all other
> >    devicetrees.
> > 
> > - removed #dma-cells from spi0 -> this is not a dma controller
> > - reword the cru assigned-clocks comment a bit
> > - fixed sdmmc1_bus4 pins, as indicated by Shawn and after looking up the
> > 
> >    correct pins in the manual
> > 
> > And a final question, are you sure about SCLK_PDM becoming a child of the
> > APLL in your cru assigned-clocks, as the APLL will vary later on with
> > cpufreq active?
> 
> the NPLL will vary later on with cpufreq active.
> 
> The NPLL is better than APLL, so NPLL is for clk_core,and apll is for pdm.
> 
> please see the TRM in CRU:
> 1.4 Function Description
> /........./
> To maximize the flexibility, some of clocks can select divider source
> from 5 PLLs. (Note: It?s
> recommended to use NEW PLL instead of ARM PLL as arm clock source,
> because NEW PLL is
> near to ARM. And it?s jitter is better than ARM PLL).

Thanks for the clarification - this way it definitly makes sense.


Thanks
Heiko