From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 12:15:31 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v5 0/6] ARM64: Add support for FSL's LS2085A SoC In-Reply-To: References: <1416048391-7557-1-git-send-email-bhupesh.sharma@freescale.com> <1482989.i0U06CvWpS@wuerfel> Message-ID: <4825970.YSq0Ouk2Yk@wuerfel> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Saturday 15 November 2014 11:06:42 bhupesh.sharma at freescale.com wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Arnd Bergmann [mailto:arnd at arndb.de] > > Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2014 4:32 PM > > To: Sharma Bhupesh-B45370 > > Cc: Catalin.Marinas at arm.com; mark.rutland at arm.com; linux-arm- > > kernel at lists.infradead.org; grant.likely at secretlab.ca; > > marc.zyngier at arm.com; rob.herring at linaro.org; > > bhupesh.sharma at freescal.com; Yoder Stuart-B08248; > > arnab_basu at rocketmail.com > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] ARM64: Add support for FSL's LS2085A SoC > > > > On Saturday 15 November 2014 16:16:25 Bhupesh Sharma wrote: > > > This patchset adds the support for FSL's LS2085A SoC which is based on > > > ARMv8 architecture. > > > > > > This patchset also has patches which address DT compatible strings for > > > nodes which appear un-documented. > > > > > > The enable-method for the CPU nodes is left for the bootloader (u-boot > > > or UEFI) to patch-up which is expected to be PSCI v0.2 > > > > > > > Looks all good to me. Are you planning to send a pull request to > > arm at kernel.org, or should we pick up the patches directly (provided no > > more new review comments)? > > > > It would be great if you can pick the patches directly (ofcourse, if there are > no new comments). > > Ok, let's wait a few more days then, once everyone is happy please send them "To: arm at kernel.org" with a request for us to merge them. Arnd