From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 13:18:29 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v2 09/12] ARM: config: append hip04_defconfig In-Reply-To: <1396944052-9887-10-git-send-email-haojian.zhuang@linaro.org> References: <1396944052-9887-1-git-send-email-haojian.zhuang@linaro.org> <1396944052-9887-10-git-send-email-haojian.zhuang@linaro.org> Message-ID: <4838811.gr7KVNHrSc@wuerfel> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tuesday 08 April 2014 16:00:49 Haojian Zhuang wrote: > Select HiP04 SoC configuration by hip04_defconfig. > > Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang > --- > arch/arm/configs/hip04_defconfig | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 arch/arm/configs/hip04_defconfig Is it necessary to have a separate defconfig for this? Since this is a fairly generic platform, I'd prefer to only enable it in the standard defconfigs like multi_v7_defconfig. It's probably time now to add a multi_v7_lpae_defconfig though. Maybe someone has other ideas, we have talked about the split between the defconfigs before. I think the latest suggestion was to remove multi_v7_defconfig and replace it with one that enables both v6 and v7, and another one that only enables v7 with LPAE (omap5, exynos5, mvebu, sunxi, hip04, vexpress, shmobile, highbank, keystone, qcom) Arnd