From: oliver@neukum.org (Oliver Neukum)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/4] USB: HCD/EHCI: giveback of URB in tasklet context
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 12:51:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4881808.FBe1KpJCmT@linux-5eaq.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACVXFVMxAddaHdjfi2rOOEW46-XA3KozULjFtLvEpo-MZC7+Aw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tuesday 11 June 2013 17:27:28 Ming Lei wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 11 June 2013 16:14:25 Ming Lei wrote:
> > The driver itself may have submitted a timer and race against it.
> > What locking do you need in complete() and a timer to lock against
> > each other?
>
> Good catch.
>
> The problem will come if only spin_lock() is called inside complete(),
> I will check main USB drivers in tree to see if there is such use case.
All network drivers race against timeout. I think they just unlink the URB,
but there's a lot of them.
> > But it makes no sense to go to a tasklet when you are already in task context.
> > In those cases you need to do something, essentially blocking the tasklet.
>
> At least now, always doing complete() in tasklet handler can simplify
> implementation since these cases aren't in hot path.
Well, I am afraid this is not simply the case. These cases are partially
synchronous. For example you need to make sure all calls to complete()
are finished before you disconnect a HCD itself. The same applies to a device
being disconnected.
It the same area, what happens if an URB is unlinked between the irq handler
and the tasklet?
Regards
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-11 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-09 15:18 [RFC PATCH 0/4] USB: HCD/EHCI: giveback of URB in tasklet context Ming Lei
2013-06-09 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] USB: HCD: support " Ming Lei
2013-06-09 15:58 ` Alan Stern
2013-06-10 8:12 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-10 8:43 ` Oliver Neukum
2013-06-10 9:23 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-10 9:31 ` Oliver Neukum
2013-06-10 9:51 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-09 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] USB: EHCI: don't release ehci->lock if URB giveback " Ming Lei
2013-06-09 16:06 ` Alan Stern
2013-06-10 9:10 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-09 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] USB: EHCI: improve interrupt qh unlink Ming Lei
2013-06-09 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] USB: EHCI: support running URB giveback in tasklet context Ming Lei
2013-06-09 15:48 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] USB: HCD/EHCI: giveback of URB " Alan Stern
2013-06-10 6:05 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-10 14:03 ` Alan Stern
2013-06-10 14:12 ` Oliver Neukum
2013-06-10 15:33 ` Alan Stern
2013-06-10 15:37 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-10 17:36 ` Alan Stern
2013-06-10 18:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-06-10 20:47 ` Alan Stern
2013-06-10 20:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-06-11 8:40 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-10 20:51 ` Alan Stern
2013-06-11 6:19 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-11 5:40 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-11 7:18 ` Oliver Neukum
2013-06-11 8:14 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-11 8:49 ` Oliver Neukum
2013-06-11 9:27 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-11 10:51 ` Oliver Neukum [this message]
2013-06-11 11:19 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-11 19:10 ` Alan Stern
2013-06-12 2:43 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-12 6:41 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-12 7:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-06-13 2:25 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-13 14:54 ` Alan Stern
2013-06-13 18:47 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-06-13 19:41 ` Alan Stern
2013-06-13 20:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-06-13 21:09 ` Alan Stern
2013-06-13 22:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-06-13 23:08 ` Alan Stern
2013-06-14 1:27 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-14 0:35 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-06-14 1:53 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-14 6:05 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-06-14 10:05 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-14 1:37 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-14 3:24 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-14 14:56 ` Alan Stern
2013-06-14 15:15 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-14 20:23 ` Alan Stern
2013-06-14 21:09 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-06-15 1:49 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-14 2:03 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-12 14:35 ` Alan Stern
2013-06-12 15:10 ` Oliver Neukum
2013-06-13 3:41 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-13 15:05 ` Alan Stern
2013-06-12 9:11 ` Oliver Neukum
2013-06-12 10:11 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-12 10:19 ` Oliver Neukum
2013-06-12 11:33 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4881808.FBe1KpJCmT@linux-5eaq.site \
--to=oliver@neukum.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).