From: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Cc: james.morse@arm.com, fenghuay@nvidia.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
hpa@zytor.com, corbet@lwn.net, x86@kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, dave.martin@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] x86,fs/resctrl,arm_mpam: Factor MBA parse-time conversion to be per-arch
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2026 16:49:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49436a6b-ab0c-4c57-8eb7-a332cd6c6f6e@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d53df455-437e-458e-a7f8-72681ab4d3fa@intel.com>
Hi Reinette,
On 6/5/26 19:41, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> On 5/15/26 7:06 AM, Ben Horgan wrote:
>> This is a new version of Dave Martin's patch [1] to delegate rounding of
>> bandwidth control user values to the arch code. As there is now more than one
>> architecture using resctrl, I split the original patch into two, a core resctrl
>> patch and an x86 patch, and added an MPAM patch. Please let me know if the patch
>> break down and ordering is sensible and whether the pattern should be followed
>> for any future similar changes.
>
> This ordering is sensible to me. I find the patch breakdown a bit fragmented since
> the logical resctrl fs change is split yet I also find that you did what was best
> to ensure bisectability. I find small changes that are local to subsystems easier to
> consider and believe it would be ideal to only have patches touching multiple
> subsystems when it cannot be avoided, for example when doing otherwise would break
> bisect. Even so, we may learn of better ways to do this when this series is considered
> for x86 inclusion.
Thanks for giving me your view on this, the review and the R-b's. I find
all your proposed changes reasonable and have included them (and only
those changes) in a v4 which I will post shortly.
Thanks,
Ben
>
> Reinette
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-06 15:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-15 14:06 [PATCH v3 0/3] x86,fs/resctrl,arm_mpam: Factor MBA parse-time conversion to be per-arch Ben Horgan
2026-05-15 14:06 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] x86/resctrl: Add resctrl_arch_preconvert_bw() Ben Horgan
2026-06-05 18:42 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-05-15 14:06 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] arm_mpam: resctrl: Add pass-through resctrl_arch_preconvert_bw() Ben Horgan
2026-06-05 18:43 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-05-15 14:06 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] fs/resctrl: Factor MBA parse-time conversion to be per-arch Ben Horgan
2026-06-05 18:43 ` Reinette Chatre
2026-06-05 18:41 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] x86,fs/resctrl,arm_mpam: " Reinette Chatre
2026-07-06 15:49 ` Ben Horgan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49436a6b-ab0c-4c57-8eb7-a332cd6c6f6e@arm.com \
--to=ben.horgan@arm.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.martin@arm.com \
--cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox