Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm64: dts: imx8-ss-vpu: Fix imx8qm VPU IRQs

[Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com>]

Am Montag, 12. August 2024, 10:45:54 CEST schrieb Peng Fan:
> > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] arm64: dts: imx8-ss-vpu: Fix imx8qm VPU IRQs
> > 
> > imx8-ss-vpu only contained imx8qxp IRQ numbers, only mu2_m0 uses
> > the correct imx8qm IRQ number, as imx8qxp lacks this MU.
> > Fix this by providing imx8qm IRQ numbers in the main imx8-ss-vpu.dtsi
> > and override the IRQ numbers in SoC-specific imx8qxp-ss-vpu.dtsi,
> > similar to reg property for VPU core devices.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com>
> > ---
> > I did not include a Fixes tag as adding support for imx8qxp and imx8qm
> > is split into several commits. It's at lease the combination of the
> > following commits:
> > 
> > 0d9968d98467d ("arm64: dts: freescale: imx8q: add imx vpu codec
> > entries") b4efce453f0ca ("arm64: dts: imx8qm: add vpu decoder and
> > encoder")
> 
> If you are using one patch to try to fix upper two commits, I think
> it would be better to separate the patch to fix the error of
> each upper commit and include Fixes tag.

Commit 0d9968d98467d ("arm64: dts: freescale: imx8q: add imx vpu codec
entries") is talking about imx8q. This is most probably i.MX8 family, while
I confused imx8q with imx8qxp, which is i.MX8X family...
The naming scheme is so confusing :(

For that reason I'll just add a Fixes for 0d9968d98467d.

Best regards,
Alexander
-- 
TQ-Systems GmbH | Mühlstraße 2, Gut Delling | 82229 Seefeld, Germany
Amtsgericht München, HRB 105018
Geschäftsführer: Detlef Schneider, Rüdiger Stahl, Stefan Schneider
http://www.tq-group.com/