From: "Kumar, Udit" <u-kumar1@ti.com>
To: "Thomas Richard (TI)" <thomas.richard@bootlin.com>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>, Tero Kristo <kristo@kernel.org>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@kernel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
"Stephen Boyd" <sboyd@kernel.org>,
Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>
Cc: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>,
<richard.genoud@bootlin.com>, Abhash Kumar <a-kumar2@ti.com>,
"Thomas Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>, Kendall Willis <k-willis@ti.com>,
<u-kumar1@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/4] firmware: ti_sci: add support for restoring IRQs during resume
Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 18:52:11 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <495082a3-1a08-45d9-90f0-4723837ec4be@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260513-ti-sci-jacinto-s2r-restore-irq-v8-2-195b27f91519@bootlin.com>
On 5/13/2026 6:16 PM, Thomas Richard (TI) wrote:
> Some DM-Firmware are not able to restore the IRQ context after a
> suspend-resume. The IRQ_CONTEXT_LOST firmware capability has been
> introduced to identify this characteristic. In this case the
> responsibility is delegated to the ti_sci driver, which maintains an
> internal list of all requested IRQs. This list is updated on each
> set()/free() operation, and all IRQs are restored during the resume_noirq()
> phase.
>
> Reviewed-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kendall Willis <k-willis@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Richard (TI) <thomas.richard@bootlin.com>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c | 201 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.h | 3 +
> 2 files changed, 192 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c b/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
> index eaeaaae94142..35ee8cc830c8 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
> @@ -12,11 +12,13 @@
> #include <linux/cpu.h>
> #include <linux/debugfs.h>
> #include <linux/export.h>
> +#include <linux/hashtable.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> #include <linux/iopoll.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/mailbox_client.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
Could you check, recursive header inclusion header warning
In file included from linux/printk.h,
from linux/srcu.h:85
from linux/notifier.h:16
from linux/reboot.h:6
-drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:31: warning: recursive header inclusion
+drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:33: warning: recursive header inclusion
> @@ -87,6 +89,16 @@ struct ti_sci_desc {
> int max_msg_size;
> };
>
> +/**
> + * struct ti_sci_irq - Description of allocated irqs
> + * @node: Link to hash table
> + * @desc: Description of the irq
> + */
> +struct ti_sci_irq {
> + struct hlist_node node;
> + struct ti_sci_msg_req_manage_irq desc;
> +};
> +
> /**
> * struct ti_sci_info - Structure representing a TI SCI instance
> * @dev: Device pointer
> @@ -101,6 +113,8 @@ struct ti_sci_desc {
> * @chan_rx: Receive mailbox channel
> * @minfo: Message info
> * @node: list head
> + * @irqs: List of allocated irqs
> + * @irq_lock: Protection for irq hash list
> * @host_id: Host ID
> * @fw_caps: FW/SoC low power capabilities
> * @users: Number of users of this instance
> @@ -118,6 +132,8 @@ struct ti_sci_info {
> struct mbox_chan *chan_rx;
> struct ti_sci_xfers_info minfo;
> struct list_head node;
> + DECLARE_HASHTABLE(irqs, 8);
> + struct mutex irq_lock;
One of script report errors, you might need to document hashtabke.
However warning is unrelated
CHECK: struct mutex definition without commen
> u8 host_id;
> u64 fw_caps;
> /* protected by ti_sci_list_mutex */
> @@ -2301,6 +2317,32 @@ static int ti_sci_manage_irq(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
> return ret;
> }
>
[..]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-18 13:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-13 12:46 [PATCH v8 0/4] firmware: ti_sci: Introduce BOARDCFG_MANAGED mode for Jacinto family Thomas Richard (TI)
2026-05-13 12:46 ` [PATCH v8 1/4] firmware: ti_sci: add BOARDCFG_MANAGED mode support Thomas Richard (TI)
2026-05-13 12:46 ` [PATCH v8 2/4] firmware: ti_sci: add support for restoring IRQs during resume Thomas Richard (TI)
2026-05-18 13:22 ` Kumar, Udit [this message]
2026-05-18 15:31 ` Thomas Richard
2026-05-13 12:46 ` [PATCH v8 3/4] clk: keystone: sci-clk: add restore_context() operation Thomas Richard (TI)
2026-05-13 12:46 ` [PATCH v8 4/4] firmware: ti_sci: add support for restoring clock context during resume Thomas Richard (TI)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=495082a3-1a08-45d9-90f0-4723837ec4be@ti.com \
--to=u-kumar1@ti.com \
--cc=a-kumar2@ti.com \
--cc=bmasney@redhat.com \
--cc=d-gole@ti.com \
--cc=gregory.clement@bootlin.com \
--cc=k-willis@ti.com \
--cc=kristo@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=richard.genoud@bootlin.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=ssantosh@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=thomas.richard@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox