public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: console vs earlycon ?
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 16:13:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4963882.HSXu6hF7zO@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <562798EB.7060202@hurleysoftware.com>

On Wednesday 21 October 2015 09:53:47 Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 10/21/2015 06:36 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 21 October 2015 18:30:05 Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I am trying to implement OF_EARLYCON_DECLARE() for that.
> >>>>
> >>>> I was just wondering if console_initcall() should work as well.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> As I said, I noticed the console_initcall() in 8250_core.c
> >>>> only works on very limited platforms.
> >>>
> >>> It works with all those that use of_serial.c, right?
> >>
> >> I doubt it.
> >>
> >>
> >> I have a board with a pure 8250-compat device working.
> >> (  compatible = "ns16550a")
> >> It uses of_serial.c, of course.
> >>
> >>
> >> As far as I tested, it would never enable the console at console_init().
> > 
> > Ok, that sounds like a bug. Peter and others have changed that code
> > a lot in the last year. I wonder if this has never worked then or
> > if it has regressed.
> 
> No, not a bug. console_init() is only for legacy platforms, not for
> probed drivers.

Ah, I had no idea we were moving in this direction. So I guess the idea
is not to add another for_each_compatible_node() loop when we already have
two places (earlycon and tty) in the code that do this?

> > * arch/powerpc/kernel/legacy_serial.c does everything we need, but
> >   does not live in architecture independent code and does a few
> >   things that we probably don't need or want there. It relies
> >   on scanning the device tree for known UART device nodes before
> >   the platform devices are added.
> > 
> > * for console_initcall() to do the right thing, we want both the
> >   ttyS devices to get added early for console=ttyS1 to work, as well
> >   as having the preferred console work based on the stdout-property.
> > 
> > * we parse the /chosen/stdout-path property in drivers/of/base and
> >   store the device node pointer in the global 'of_stdout' variable,
> >   but do not use it until the uart is added by the tty driver
> >   and calls of_console_check() to add the default console device.
> 
> I'm assuming the issue with trying to get console_init() working
> is because the dummy color console causes the earlycon to be disabled?

I don't think so.

My line of thinking was more about usability: earlycon requires that
you edit the kernel command line at the moment, while console_init()
doesn't require any user interaction and just uses the stdout-path.

I guess we could enable earlycon using a Kconfig symbol if we want
to, or make it a per-architecture decision whether it's enabled even
in the absence of the command line flag.

	Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-21 14:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-21  8:21 console vs earlycon ? Masahiro Yamada
2015-10-21  8:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-21  9:09   ` Masahiro Yamada
2015-10-21  9:19     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-21  9:30       ` Masahiro Yamada
2015-10-21 10:36         ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-21 13:53           ` Peter Hurley
2015-10-21 14:13             ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2015-10-21 15:32               ` Peter Hurley
2015-10-21 19:00                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-21 19:24                   ` Peter Hurley
2015-10-21 22:54                     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-21 13:20 ` Peter Hurley
2015-10-22  4:47   ` Masahiro Yamada

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4963882.HSXu6hF7zO@wuerfel \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox