From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B43C0C00A89 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 09:37:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 138C22083B for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 09:37:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="yvuJ+y8Z"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="lPUGuKiO" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 138C22083B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=DTM6NTJxNtXjx7FddA7B4p1hUBigQ6qjhRL/q0l7upo=; b=yvuJ+y8ZUvjr3WE3bs14Jibhj yywVWEjcQSfpDdMnStoLVjCDOOZnB1lCY6XevLXmHxuYYhHBJwQLD8K+le2rv4DNr0Y8PAb39i5PK AweLhea0spSTWV1aBfb1g+hRjn6xkObb7iKF0u6n63MwZc2XHSQA1BkdGA63+Z09obhKDAaH27xoN deV9QNRRKl8D4OwU2vnPdzTdiCdkjfw5DF8f42M4feJMFZ9a1TmEVxNVUMsszGZB7QgstlJr50Ona PpTavlI9zU50JF52gq/Bs9cDINzE7NTsP258VCezs2fH+7ZT1m9K/B/3oDNdrwCCCDR0I4TCHwgZ2 0I6nz2Q7A==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kYQpr-0002r1-V0; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 09:36:39 +0000 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kYQpo-0002qC-VJ for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 09:36:38 +0000 Received: from lelv0266.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.225]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09U9aNtH011493; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 04:36:23 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1604050583; bh=plbRCPunQhuoqC8RieptDvFiVzdwprZYDvYCIEZB/dg=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=lPUGuKiO0JhRuZYhGTyRHyexUQc0c3hnjUXZ9lMQTItomQQDUD5SX3zJLnc77O0GA KDn9sGTIznuVpKzpO6Vb2aPih1dmPk9Am+c06QGmztv4GFt4CTBuF19/ZHQd0gfqUH ZxUgdK12jHfp5i/qJ/fZLb+mh6RQyNxrU2USY8aQ= Received: from DLEE108.ent.ti.com (dlee108.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.38]) by lelv0266.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 09U9aNER122177 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 30 Oct 2020 04:36:23 -0500 Received: from DLEE104.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.34) by DLEE108.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.38) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 04:36:23 -0500 Received: from fllv0040.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.20) by DLEE104.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 04:36:23 -0500 Received: from [10.250.100.73] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0040.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09U9aIv8019998; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 04:36:19 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: ti: Enable networking options for nfs boot To: Arnd Bergmann References: <20201001202725.16034-1-grygorii.strashko@ti.com> <20201002125000.5b5kho4e5de7jjrj@akan> From: Grygorii Strashko Message-ID: <497f744e-68be-7a87-6a18-824249ddcac8@ti.com> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 11:36:24 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201030_053637_178107_A53CBCFA X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 28.63 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Nishanth Menon , Vignesh Raghavendra , Arnd Bergmann , Tony Lindgren , Sekhar Nori , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Russell King , Olof Johansson , linux-omap , Linux ARM Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Arnd, On 29/10/2020 22:06, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 8:15 PM Grygorii Strashko > wrote: >> On 02/10/2020 15:50, Nishanth Menon wrote: >>> On 23:27-20201001, Grygorii Strashko wrote: >>>> Enable networking options required for NFS boot on TI platforms, which is >>>> widely for automated test systems. >>>> - enable new TI CPSW switch driver and related NET_SWITCHDEV config >>>> - enable TI DP83867 phy >>>> - explicitly enable PTP clock support to ensure dependent networking >>>> drivers will stay built-in >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko >>>> --- >>>> arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 5 +++++ >>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) >>>> >>> >>> [...] >>> >>> Reviewed-by: Nishanth Menon >>> >> >> Are there any actions need to be done to have this patch merged? > > I would prefer if a platform maintainer (I assume Tony in this case) > picks it up and forwards it to soc@kernel.org together with other > related changes. Olof and I tend to ignore patches sent directly > to us, so we don't get in the way of platform maintainers that > may have already merged similar patches or have comments. > > I suspect Tony didn't pick it up either because from the patch > subject and the description, it is not clear that he is the one > to act on it. It helps to be more specific and ask the maintainer > by addressing them in person below the '---' line, as well as > only putting one person in 'To:' and the rest in 'Cc:'. Thanks for your comments and sorry that I disturbed you. But, honestly, I'm confused (and probably I'm not the first one) as multi_v7 is common for all ARM platforms while change is TI OMAP specific, and neither Documentation neither get_maintainer.pl provide any reliable information on how to proceed :( and who should be responsible for merging multi_x patches. I'd really have tried to do some checking while preparing patch and TO/CC list - some patches applied by platform maintainers, but some by top ARM maintainers. > > One comment on the contents of the patch: IIRC this is a fairly > large driver. To ensure we don't burden other users too much, > can you include the size of the vmlinux file before and after > this patch? before: text data bss dec hex filename 14703736 8024602 444976 23173314 16198c2 ./omap-arm/vmlinux after: text data bss dec hex filename 14727271 8029150 444528 23200949 16204b5 ./omap-arm/vmlinux diff: 27635 (dec) -- Best regards, grygorii _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel