From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH V3 1/4] pci: APM X-Gene PCIe controller driver
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 21:12:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4985267.LnsktRmabM@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACoXjcnXoysMeBsGuOb3t5b10zdeJ8pOnuOOzR8AaZhsOOYVEw@mail.gmail.com>
On Monday 03 February 2014 11:42:22 Tanmay Inamdar wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 6:16 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > On Friday 24 January 2014, Tanmay Inamdar wrote:
> >
> >> +static void xgene_pcie_fixup_bridge(struct pci_dev *dev)
> >> +{
> >> + int i;
> >> +
> >> + /* Hide the PCI host BARs from the kernel as their content doesn't
> >> + * fit well in the resource management
> >> + */
> >> + for (i = 0; i < DEVICE_COUNT_RESOURCE; i++) {
> >> + dev->resource[i].start = dev->resource[i].end = 0;
> >> + dev->resource[i].flags = 0;
> >> + }
> >> + dev_info(&dev->dev, "Hiding X-Gene pci host bridge resources %s\n",
> >> + pci_name(dev));
> >> +}
> >> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(XGENE_PCIE_VENDORID, XGENE_PCIE_DEVICEID,
> >> + xgene_pcie_fixup_bridge);
> >
> > Shouldn't this be gone now that the host bridge is correctly shown
> > at the domain root?
>
> In inbound region configuration, whole DDR space is mapped into the
> BAR of RC. When Linux PCI mid-layer starts enumerating, it reads the
> size of BAR of RC and tries to fit it into the memory resource. First
> thing is that the outbound memory is not enough to map the inbound BAR
> space. This creates problem with the resource management logic and
> second thing is that, it is not required to map inbound BAR space RC
> bar as no one will be accessing it further.
>
> As Jason suggested, Bridge BAR's should be 0 size unless the bridge
> itself has registers. However this is not the case with XGene PCIe
> controller. It may have been inherited from the legacy design.
> 'arch/powerpc/sysdev/ppc4xx_pci.c' has similar fixup function.
Are you sure that is true for the root bridge as well? I don't
remember the details, but I though that for the host bridge,
we don't actually look at the BARs at all.
> > If you want to try out the I/O space, I'd suggest using an Intel
> > e1000 network card, which has both memory and i/o space. There
> > is a patch at http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-pci/msg27684.html
> > that lets you check the I/O registers on it, or you can go
> > through /dev/port from user space.
> >
> > I also haven't seen your patch that adds pci_ioremap_io() for
> > arm64. It would be helpful to keep it in the same patch
> > series, since it won't build without this patch.
>
> I will post the arm64 pci patch along with next revision of this
> driver. That will cover the 'pci_ioremap_io' as well.
Please note that today, Liviu Dudau has also posted patches for this,
so you should coordinate a bit.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-03 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-24 21:32 [RFC PATCH V3 0/4] APM X-Gene PCIe controller Tanmay Inamdar
2014-01-24 21:32 ` [RFC PATCH V3 1/4] pci: APM X-Gene PCIe controller driver Tanmay Inamdar
2014-01-30 14:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-03 19:42 ` Tanmay Inamdar
2014-02-03 20:12 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2014-02-03 20:14 ` Tanmay Inamdar
2014-02-03 22:15 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-02-04 19:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-24 21:32 ` [RFC PATCH V3 2/4] arm64: dts: APM X-Gene PCIe device tree nodes Tanmay Inamdar
2014-01-30 14:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-24 21:32 ` [RFC PATCH V3 3/4] dt-bindings: pci: xgene pcie device tree bindings Tanmay Inamdar
2014-01-24 21:32 ` [RFC PATCH V3 4/4] MAINTAINERS: entry for APM X-Gene PCIe host driver Tanmay Inamdar
2014-01-25 16:09 ` [RFC PATCH V3 0/4] APM X-Gene PCIe controller Dann Frazier
2014-01-27 22:58 ` Tanmay Inamdar
2014-01-30 0:18 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-01-30 0:40 ` Tanmay Inamdar
2014-01-30 14:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-30 18:06 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-01-30 14:17 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4985267.LnsktRmabM@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).