From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 497C9CAC5B0 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2025 08:33:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date: MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=n6IgvnJf+TwuohwKNDrr1f+Fnh1ZrNwh++ABQ4h5jac=; b=SRC0O9RZPu92oiWGaybHcBbV7v gI65xvVXpbpybuPqrvtgdo5hpUlls6Os3mfXGZVUjqY07DqUYgp95uFS3P2fBXRWwY05kCUYLCPSY MddIusAtsY9Q2JF4HY/5wYFEwh9UExcB+aRW2TRyorGgV0e94BC5ym+/8Cm/qmtC0V4Rj2d9PeD3Q NevzCNgBugQHFPy2LlrOIjzPSi0QXB3S1SqNaTW4rqIRE5719+HYDCE7qDJFWJVFIDgIMFqq9oTut noYBS/K/8NvXJybhyqLgAMYYmf6ICLeQoVpgdVch884bSO2DHqtGw0IZSQik3RC6n/rKL8Jzv2QGo iw+HOlyA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1v39Jg-00000001nSP-0lGL; Mon, 29 Sep 2025 08:33:04 +0000 Received: from mail.manjaro.org ([116.203.91.91]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1v39Je-00000001nS0-1TxE; Mon, 29 Sep 2025 08:33:03 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=manjaro.org; s=2021; t=1759134780; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=n6IgvnJf+TwuohwKNDrr1f+Fnh1ZrNwh++ABQ4h5jac=; b=r2V41+vfGVhb91wQwN19qdC63ckj2jVdjphymcYJTu5Jx2T4hXThp+0oY3ErPz+RH7rTEt +93F1HDZZ9LX6LeLJMssOs2NZ5ZtHCCgMh/+vNumqvhI7E0jd6PT9/5NHEvmJ3sYOKOZid LXu+fHBDfCRweYj/Ne/22L20BtGfy1Jzl+gWO9zZ0wuV92UF/F53dZ0sVJoZFRfHBFhRs3 xWos+OQPdycV/ExXd2xwUPY68QE3ImwziUwhzEDpLqz0HY3QAGJBdhGkcYj/VI8kFXrslU TN5iTmXXB1ipMxjVRP8czyQjyl7gaPlZ3JxxQgEDNyVFOI4v1d5hBc20sRG9FA== Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 10:32:59 +0200 From: Dragan Simic To: guptarud@gmail.com Cc: Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Heiko Stuebner , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ondrej Jirman , Martijn Braam , =?UTF-8?Q?Kam?= =?UTF-8?Q?il_Trzci=C5=84ski?= , "Leonardo G. Trombetta" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Upstreaming Pinephone Pro Patches In-Reply-To: <20250929-ppp_light_accel_mag_vol-down-v4-0-6598f22d3451@gmail.com> References: <20250929-ppp_light_accel_mag_vol-down-v4-0-6598f22d3451@gmail.com> Message-ID: <49dafe9afc5962d8fec10e6135c9b84d@manjaro.org> X-Sender: dsimic@manjaro.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Authentication-Results: ORIGINATING; auth=pass smtp.auth=dsimic@manjaro.org smtp.mailfrom=dsimic@manjaro.org X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250929_013302_576298_EA38373A X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 8.33 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hello Rudraksha, On 2025-09-29 09:35, Rudraksha Gupta via B4 Relay wrote: > arm64: dts: rk3399-pinephone-pro: Add light/proximity sensor > support > arm64: dts: rk3399-pinephone-pro: Add accelerometer sensor > support > arm64: dts: rk3399-pinephone-pro: Add magnetometer sensor support > arm64: dts: rk3399-pinephone-pro: Fix voltage threshold for > volume keys Please note that the patch summaries/subjects are still a bit wrong in the v4 of this series, because there should be no "rk3399-pinephone-pro:" prefixes in them. You can always check the commit history for the file you're editing, to see what's the expected format of the patch summary. It differs a bit between the subsystems and architectures, so it should always be checked.