From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: davidjon@xenontk.org (David John) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:26:45 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: Mailing lists have moved In-Reply-To: <1250868957.3311.110.camel@macbook.infradead.org> References: <1250855566.3311.100.camel@macbook.infradead.org> <1250868957.3311.110.camel@macbook.infradead.org> Message-ID: <4A8EC3BD.3000107@xenontk.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 08/21/2009 09:05 PM, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 09:27 -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote: >> >> >>> Russell no longer wants to maintain the mailing lists, so with his >>> blessing I have set up replacements at lists.infradead.org. >> >> Can you help us understand why the existing linux-arm at vger.kernel.org >> list is not used for this? > > Russell didn't want to do that, so I offered an alternative solution > preserving the three separate lists (l-a, l-a-kernel, l-a-toolchain). > Would it be too much to ask that linux-arm at vger be used for ARM kernel development, with the other two lists at infradead? Maintaining multiple kernel development lists was one of the problems mentioned, with people unsure as to which list to subscribe to and having to subscribe to both lists in case mails were posted to the vger list. Maintaining a _single_ kernel mailing list would be ideal. Regards, David.