From: shinya.kuribayashi@necel.com (Shinya Kuribayashi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 12/16] i2c-designware: Divide i2c_dw_xfer_msg into two functions
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:52:49 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AD3EB81.9060803@necel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AD3E974.8080200@necel.com>
We have some steps at the top of i2c_dw_xfer_msg() to set up the slave
address and enable the DW I2C core. It's executed only when we don't
have STATUS_WRITE_IN_PROGRESS.
Then we need to make sure that STATUS_WRITE_IN_PROGRESS only indicates
that we have a pending i2c_msg to process. In other words, even if
STATUS_WRITE_IN_PROGRESS is not set, that doesn't mean we're at initial
state in the I2C transaction.
Since i2c_dw_xfer_msg() will be invoked again and again during the
transaction, those init steps have a possibility to be re-processed
needlessly. For example, this issue easily takes place when processing
a combined transaction with a certain condition (the number of tx bytes
in the first i2c_msg == Tx FIFO depth).
Consequently we should not use STATUS_WRITE_IN_PROGRESS to determine
where we're at in the I2C transaction, then let's separate those
initialization steps from i2c_dw_xfer_msg().
Signed-off-by: Shinya Kuribayashi <shinya.kuribayashi@necel.com>
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.c
index d9b5790..de006f0 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.c
@@ -325,6 +325,29 @@ static int i2c_dw_wait_bus_not_busy(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
return 0;
}
+static void i2c_dw_xfer_init(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
+{
+ struct i2c_msg *msgs = dev->msgs;
+ u32 ic_con;
+
+ /* Disable the adapter */
+ writel(0, dev->base + DW_IC_ENABLE);
+
+ /* set the slave (target) address */
+ writel(msgs[dev->msg_write_idx].addr, dev->base + DW_IC_TAR);
+
+ /* if the slave address is ten bit address, enable 10BITADDR */
+ ic_con = readl(dev->base + DW_IC_CON);
+ if (msgs[dev->msg_write_idx].flags & I2C_M_TEN)
+ ic_con |= DW_IC_CON_10BITADDR_MASTER;
+ else
+ ic_con &= ~DW_IC_CON_10BITADDR_MASTER;
+ writel(ic_con, dev->base + DW_IC_CON);
+
+ /* Enable the adapter */
+ writel(1, dev->base + DW_IC_ENABLE);
+}
+
/*
* Initiate low level master read/write transaction.
* This function is called from i2c_dw_xfer when starting a transfer.
@@ -335,31 +358,12 @@ static void
i2c_dw_xfer_msg(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
{
struct i2c_msg *msgs = dev->msgs;
- u32 ic_con, intr_mask;
+ u32 intr_mask;
int tx_limit = dev->tx_fifo_depth - readl(dev->base + DW_IC_TXFLR);
int rx_limit = dev->rx_fifo_depth - readl(dev->base + DW_IC_RXFLR);
u32 addr = msgs[dev->msg_write_idx].addr;
u32 buf_len = dev->tx_buf_len;
- if (!(dev->status & STATUS_WRITE_IN_PROGRESS)) {
- /* Disable the adapter */
- writel(0, dev->base + DW_IC_ENABLE);
-
- /* set the slave (target) address */
- writel(msgs[dev->msg_write_idx].addr, dev->base + DW_IC_TAR);
-
- /* if the slave address is ten bit address, enable 10BITADDR */
- ic_con = readl(dev->base + DW_IC_CON);
- if (msgs[dev->msg_write_idx].flags & I2C_M_TEN)
- ic_con |= DW_IC_CON_10BITADDR_MASTER;
- else
- ic_con &= ~DW_IC_CON_10BITADDR_MASTER;
- writel(ic_con, dev->base + DW_IC_CON);
-
- /* Enable the adapter */
- writel(1, dev->base + DW_IC_ENABLE);
- }
-
for (; dev->msg_write_idx < dev->msgs_num; dev->msg_write_idx++) {
/* if target address has changed, we need to
* reprogram the target address in the i2c
@@ -474,6 +478,7 @@ i2c_dw_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg msgs[], int num)
goto done;
/* start the transfers */
+ i2c_dw_xfer_init(dev);
i2c_dw_xfer_msg(dev);
/* wait for tx to complete */
--
1.6.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-13 2:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-13 2:44 [RFC] i2c-designware patches Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:48 ` [PATCH 01/16] i2c-designware: Consolidate to use 32-bit word accesses Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:48 ` [PATCH 02/16] i2c-designware: Don't use the IC_CLR_INTR register to clear interrupts Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:49 ` [PATCH 03/16] i2c-designware: Use platform_get_irq helper Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:49 ` [PATCH 04/16] i2c-designware: i2c_dw_read: Take "struct dw_i2c_dev" pointer Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:50 ` [PATCH 05/16] i2c-designware: i2c_dw_xfer_msg: " Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:50 ` [PATCH 06/16] i2c-designware: Remove an useless local variable "num" Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:50 ` [PATCH 07/16] i2c-designware: Set a clock name to DesignWare I2C clock source Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 9:54 ` Mark Brown
2009-10-14 4:19 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 22:41 ` Ben Dooks
2009-10-14 4:19 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-14 10:09 ` Mark Brown
2009-10-14 19:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-10-15 3:37 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:51 ` [PATCH 08/16] i2c-designware: Improve _HCNT/_LCNT calculation Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:51 ` [PATCH 09/16] i2c-designware: i2c_dw_xfer_msg: Fix an i2c_msg search bug Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:52 ` [PATCH 10/16] i2c-designware: Do dw_i2c_pump_msg's jobs in the interrutp handler Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:52 ` [PATCH 11/16] i2c-designware: Set Tx/Rx FIFO threshold levels Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:52 ` Shinya Kuribayashi [this message]
2009-10-13 2:53 ` [PATCH 13/16] i2c-designware: i2c_dw_xfer_msg: Introduce a local "buf" pointer Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:53 ` [PATCH 14/16] i2c-designware: Deferred FIFO-data-counting variables initialization Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:53 ` [PATCH 15/16] i2c-designware: i2c_dw_xfer_msg: Mark as completed on an error Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-15 5:29 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 2:54 ` [PATCH 16/16] i2c-designware: Add I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_* bits Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-14 18:53 ` Baruch Siach
2009-10-15 3:22 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 7:04 ` [RFC] i2c-designware patches Baruch Siach
2009-10-13 8:01 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-14 19:02 ` Baruch Siach
2009-10-19 1:23 ` Shinya Kuribayashi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AD3EB81.9060803@necel.com \
--to=shinya.kuribayashi@necel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).