linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: shinya.kuribayashi@necel.com (Shinya Kuribayashi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 12/16] i2c-designware: Divide i2c_dw_xfer_msg into two functions
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:52:49 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AD3EB81.9060803@necel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AD3E974.8080200@necel.com>

We have some steps at the top of i2c_dw_xfer_msg() to set up the slave
address and enable the DW I2C core.  It's executed only when we don't
have STATUS_WRITE_IN_PROGRESS.

Then we need to make sure that STATUS_WRITE_IN_PROGRESS only indicates
that we have a pending i2c_msg to process.  In other words, even if
STATUS_WRITE_IN_PROGRESS is not set, that doesn't mean we're at initial
state in the I2C transaction.

Since i2c_dw_xfer_msg() will be invoked again and again during the
transaction, those init steps have a possibility to be re-processed
needlessly.  For example, this issue easily takes place when processing
a combined transaction with a certain condition (the number of tx bytes
in the first i2c_msg == Tx FIFO depth).

Consequently we should not use STATUS_WRITE_IN_PROGRESS to determine
where we're at in the I2C transaction, then let's separate those
initialization steps from i2c_dw_xfer_msg().

Signed-off-by: Shinya Kuribayashi <shinya.kuribayashi@necel.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.c |   45 +++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.c
index d9b5790..de006f0 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware.c
@@ -325,6 +325,29 @@ static int i2c_dw_wait_bus_not_busy(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void i2c_dw_xfer_init(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
+{
+	struct i2c_msg *msgs = dev->msgs;
+	u32 ic_con;
+
+	/* Disable the adapter */
+	writel(0, dev->base + DW_IC_ENABLE);
+
+	/* set the slave (target) address */
+	writel(msgs[dev->msg_write_idx].addr, dev->base + DW_IC_TAR);
+
+	/* if the slave address is ten bit address, enable 10BITADDR */
+	ic_con = readl(dev->base + DW_IC_CON);
+	if (msgs[dev->msg_write_idx].flags & I2C_M_TEN)
+		ic_con |= DW_IC_CON_10BITADDR_MASTER;
+	else
+		ic_con &= ~DW_IC_CON_10BITADDR_MASTER;
+	writel(ic_con, dev->base + DW_IC_CON);
+
+	/* Enable the adapter */
+	writel(1, dev->base + DW_IC_ENABLE);
+}
+
 /*
  * Initiate low level master read/write transaction.
  * This function is called from i2c_dw_xfer when starting a transfer.
@@ -335,31 +358,12 @@ static void
 i2c_dw_xfer_msg(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
 {
 	struct i2c_msg *msgs = dev->msgs;
-	u32 ic_con, intr_mask;
+	u32 intr_mask;
 	int tx_limit = dev->tx_fifo_depth - readl(dev->base + DW_IC_TXFLR);
 	int rx_limit = dev->rx_fifo_depth - readl(dev->base + DW_IC_RXFLR);
 	u32 addr = msgs[dev->msg_write_idx].addr;
 	u32 buf_len = dev->tx_buf_len;
 
-	if (!(dev->status & STATUS_WRITE_IN_PROGRESS)) {
-		/* Disable the adapter */
-		writel(0, dev->base + DW_IC_ENABLE);
-
-		/* set the slave (target) address */
-		writel(msgs[dev->msg_write_idx].addr, dev->base + DW_IC_TAR);
-
-		/* if the slave address is ten bit address, enable 10BITADDR */
-		ic_con = readl(dev->base + DW_IC_CON);
-		if (msgs[dev->msg_write_idx].flags & I2C_M_TEN)
-			ic_con |= DW_IC_CON_10BITADDR_MASTER;
-		else
-			ic_con &= ~DW_IC_CON_10BITADDR_MASTER;
-		writel(ic_con, dev->base + DW_IC_CON);
-
-		/* Enable the adapter */
-		writel(1, dev->base + DW_IC_ENABLE);
-	}
-
 	for (; dev->msg_write_idx < dev->msgs_num; dev->msg_write_idx++) {
 		/* if target address has changed, we need to
 		 * reprogram the target address in the i2c
@@ -474,6 +478,7 @@ i2c_dw_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg msgs[], int num)
 		goto done;
 
 	/* start the transfers */
+	i2c_dw_xfer_init(dev);
 	i2c_dw_xfer_msg(dev);
 
 	/* wait for tx to complete */
-- 
1.6.5

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-10-13  2:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-13  2:44 [RFC] i2c-designware patches Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13  2:48 ` [PATCH 01/16] i2c-designware: Consolidate to use 32-bit word accesses Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13  2:48 ` [PATCH 02/16] i2c-designware: Don't use the IC_CLR_INTR register to clear interrupts Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13  2:49 ` [PATCH 03/16] i2c-designware: Use platform_get_irq helper Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13  2:49 ` [PATCH 04/16] i2c-designware: i2c_dw_read: Take "struct dw_i2c_dev" pointer Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13  2:50 ` [PATCH 05/16] i2c-designware: i2c_dw_xfer_msg: " Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13  2:50 ` [PATCH 06/16] i2c-designware: Remove an useless local variable "num" Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13  2:50 ` [PATCH 07/16] i2c-designware: Set a clock name to DesignWare I2C clock source Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13  9:54   ` Mark Brown
2009-10-14  4:19     ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13 22:41   ` Ben Dooks
2009-10-14  4:19     ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-14 10:09       ` Mark Brown
2009-10-14 19:14       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-10-15  3:37         ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13  2:51 ` [PATCH 08/16] i2c-designware: Improve _HCNT/_LCNT calculation Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13  2:51 ` [PATCH 09/16] i2c-designware: i2c_dw_xfer_msg: Fix an i2c_msg search bug Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13  2:52 ` [PATCH 10/16] i2c-designware: Do dw_i2c_pump_msg's jobs in the interrutp handler Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13  2:52 ` [PATCH 11/16] i2c-designware: Set Tx/Rx FIFO threshold levels Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13  2:52 ` Shinya Kuribayashi [this message]
2009-10-13  2:53 ` [PATCH 13/16] i2c-designware: i2c_dw_xfer_msg: Introduce a local "buf" pointer Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13  2:53 ` [PATCH 14/16] i2c-designware: Deferred FIFO-data-counting variables initialization Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13  2:53 ` [PATCH 15/16] i2c-designware: i2c_dw_xfer_msg: Mark as completed on an error Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-15  5:29   ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13  2:54 ` [PATCH 16/16] i2c-designware: Add I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_* bits Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-14 18:53   ` Baruch Siach
2009-10-15  3:22     ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-13  7:04 ` [RFC] i2c-designware patches Baruch Siach
2009-10-13  8:01   ` Shinya Kuribayashi
2009-10-14 19:02 ` Baruch Siach
2009-10-19  1:23   ` Shinya Kuribayashi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AD3EB81.9060803@necel.com \
    --to=shinya.kuribayashi@necel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).