linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: valentin.longchamp@epfl.ch (Valentin Longchamp)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] mx31moboard: camera support
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 19:11:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ADF40BC.4090801@epfl.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091020080941.GN8818@pengutronix.de>

Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 06:41:13PM +0200, Valentin Longchamp wrote:
>> Hi Guennadi,
>>
>> Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> On Thu, 15 Oct 2009, Valentin Longchamp wrote:
>>>
>>>> We have two mt9t031 cameras that have a muxed bus on the robot.
>>>> We can control which one we are using with gpio outputs. This
>>>> currently is not optimal
>>> So, what prevents you from registering two platform devices for your 
>>> two cameras? Is there a problem with that?
>> The lack of time until now to do it properly. I sent those patches as  
>> initial RFC (and by the way thanks for your comment).
>>
>> I would like to have one video interface only and that I can switch  
>> between the two physical camera using a quite simple system call. Would  
>> that be compatible with registering the two platform devices ?
> 
> Wouldn't it be better to have /dev/video[01] for two cameras? How do
> keep the registers synchron between both cameras otherwise?
> 

Well, from my experimentations, most initializations are done when you 
open the device. So if you close the device, switch camera and open it 
again, the registers are initialized with the need values. Of course 
there is a problem is you switch camera while the device is open.

It could be ok with /dev/video[01], but I would need something that 
would prevent one device to be opened when the other already is open (a 
mutex, but where ?).

Besides, I have read a slide from Dongsoo Kim 
(http://www.celinuxforum.org/CelfPubWiki/ELC2009Presentations?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Framework_for_digital_camera_in_linux-in_detail.ppt 
slides 41-47) and the cleanest solution would be to have the two chips 
enumerated with VIDIOC_ENUMINPUT as proposed. What would then be the 
v4l2 call to switch from one device to each other ? How to "link" it 
with the kernel code that make the real hardware switching ?

Thanks for your inputs.

Val

-- 
Valentin Longchamp, PhD Student, EPFL-STI-LSRO1
valentin.longchamp at epfl.ch, Phone: +41216937827
http://people.epfl.ch/valentin.longchamp
MEA3485, Station 9, CH-1015 Lausanne

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-21 17:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-15  9:42 [RFC] mx31moboard: patches for next merge window Valentin Longchamp
2009-10-15  9:42 ` [PATCH 1/6] mx31: various pins used for mx31moboard Valentin Longchamp
2009-10-15  9:42   ` [PATCH 2/6] mx31moboard: serial port fix Valentin Longchamp
2009-10-15  9:42     ` [PATCH 3/6] mx31moboard: support for pin linked for battery presence check Valentin Longchamp
2009-10-15  9:42       ` [PATCH 4/6] mx31moboard: initialize ipu device for all the boards Valentin Longchamp
2009-10-15  9:42         ` [PATCH 5/6] mx31moboard: camera support Valentin Longchamp
2009-10-15  9:43           ` [PATCH 6/6] mx31moboard: SPI and MC13783 votage regulator support Valentin Longchamp
2009-10-16  8:18             ` Uwe Kleine-König
2009-10-16 18:35           ` [PATCH 5/6] mx31moboard: camera support Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-10-16 21:09           ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2009-10-19 16:41             ` Valentin Longchamp
2009-10-20  8:09               ` Sascha Hauer
2009-10-21 17:11                 ` Valentin Longchamp [this message]
2009-10-23 23:45                   ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2009-10-28 14:32                     ` Valentin Longchamp
2009-11-03 11:31                       ` Valentin Longchamp
2009-11-04 18:22                         ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2009-11-04 21:37                           ` Valentin Longchamp
2009-10-23 22:56           ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2009-10-28 14:36             ` Valentin Longchamp
2009-10-15 22:14 ` [RFC] mx31moboard: patches for next merge window Sascha Hauer
2009-10-16  8:17 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2009-10-16  9:02   ` Valentin Longchamp
2009-10-24  8:25     ` Uwe Kleine-König

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4ADF40BC.4090801@epfl.ch \
    --to=valentin.longchamp@epfl.ch \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).