* At91SAM9G20 AT91_MCI patches @ 2009-10-30 8:47 Retallack, Mark 2009-10-30 17:07 ` Nicolas Ferre 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Retallack, Mark @ 2009-10-30 8:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Good morning, I hope this is the correct list. I am using the AT91SAM9G20-EK dev board. It does not look like the vanilla kernel (2.6.27+) contains the patch for support in the drivers/mmc/host/at91_mci.c file. Patch 5130/3 contains the correct information, however the final patch 5130/4 has the at91_mci section removed. Was there a reason for this? http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=5130/3 http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=5130/4 Also it would be useful to know what the preferred MCI (MMC) driver for the AT91SAM9G20 is; the at91_mci or atmel_mci. The revision A and B AT91SAM9G20-EK dev board (board-sam9g20ek.c) uses the at91_mci driver, but the revision C AT91SAM9G20-EK dev board (board-sam9g20ek-2slot-mmc.c) uses atmel_mci driver. Thanks in advance Mark Retallack. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* At91SAM9G20 AT91_MCI patches 2009-10-30 8:47 At91SAM9G20 AT91_MCI patches Retallack, Mark @ 2009-10-30 17:07 ` Nicolas Ferre 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Nicolas Ferre @ 2009-10-30 17:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Retallack, Mark : > Good morning, I hope this is the correct list. > > I am using the AT91SAM9G20-EK dev board. It does not look like the vanilla kernel (2.6.27+) contains the patch for support in the drivers/mmc/host/at91_mci.c file. Patch 5130/3 contains the correct information, however the final patch 5130/4 has the at91_mci section removed. Was there a reason for this? > > http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=5130/3 > http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=5130/4 I advice you to go with Linux4sam.org experimental patches for 2.6.27. for 2.6.30 you have a preview here: ftp://ftp.linux4sam.org/devel/linux/ (pick the 3 ones that are at91_mci related) > Also it would be useful to know what the preferred MCI (MMC) driver for the AT91SAM9G20 is; the at91_mci or atmel_mci. The revision A and B AT91SAM9G20-EK dev board (board-sam9g20ek.c) uses the at91_mci driver, but the revision C AT91SAM9G20-EK dev board (board-sam9g20ek-2slot-mmc.c) uses atmel_mci driver. Dual slot 9g20 has a patch to enable at91_mci use: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2009-October/002577.html - atmel_mci allow the use of 2 slots but does not handle PDC (DMA data transfers) - at91_mci is using PDC (recommended with experimental patches mentioned above) Best regards, -- Nicolas Ferre ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-10-30 17:07 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2009-10-30 8:47 At91SAM9G20 AT91_MCI patches Retallack, Mark 2009-10-30 17:07 ` Nicolas Ferre
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).