From: trd@45mercystreet.com (Toby Douglass)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: GCC built-in atomic operations and memory barriers
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:17:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AF4765B.5080303@45mercystreet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AF1FBA4.4070307@xenomai.org>
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> The kernel API is the syscall interface and associated data structures.
>> It does not include everything you can find in kernel headers.
>
> Are the functions found in the vectors page part of the kernel API?
> Because if that is so, then they provide a way to implement cmpxchg and
> barriers in user-space.
GCC (I had overlooked this) has a function, __sync_synchronize(), which
provides a full memory barrier. I do not know how it is implemented on
ARM, but the CAS I wrote certainly would not work (and did not work)
without a memory barrier and with this function inserted, does work.
The GCC atomic CAS for ARM appears to call the OS's compare-exchange
function, which certainly is broken, by lacking memory barriers, on the
Linux I am developing on.
Either way, I now have my own platform independent ARM __asm__ for LL/CS
CAS, with memory barriers, so I'm happy. Also, I got my OpenGL wrapper
DLL working last night :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-06 19:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-04 18:09 GCC built-in atomic operations and memory barriers Toby Douglass
2009-11-04 19:05 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-11-04 20:12 ` Toby Douglass
2009-11-04 21:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-11-06 19:10 ` Toby Douglass
2009-11-04 22:09 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2009-11-06 19:17 ` Toby Douglass [this message]
2009-11-21 15:21 ` CAS implementation may be broken Toby Douglass
2009-11-23 15:08 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-11-23 19:10 ` Toby Douglass
2009-11-23 20:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-11-23 20:34 ` Toby Douglass
2009-11-23 15:13 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-11-24 15:15 ` Toby Douglass
2009-11-24 15:36 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-11-24 16:20 ` Toby Douglass
2009-11-24 16:27 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-11-24 17:14 ` Toby Douglass
2009-11-25 1:24 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-11-26 16:14 ` Toby Douglass
2009-11-27 1:37 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-11-24 15:33 ` Toby Douglass
2009-11-23 15:34 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-11-23 16:40 ` Toby Douglass
2009-11-23 22:28 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-11-23 23:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-11-24 1:32 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-11-24 11:19 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-11-24 22:24 ` Toby Douglass
2009-11-25 11:11 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-11-25 18:57 ` Toby Douglass
2009-11-24 22:34 ` Toby Douglass
2009-11-24 22:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-11-25 0:34 ` Toby Douglass
2009-11-24 9:38 ` Toby Douglass
2009-11-24 15:59 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-11-24 16:34 ` Toby Douglass
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AF4765B.5080303@45mercystreet.com \
--to=trd@45mercystreet.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).