[GIT PULL] AT91 Kconfig rework

[GIT PULL] AT91 Kconfig rework

[Nicolas Ferre]

Hi Russell,

This is AT91 Kconfig rework for next merge window. After 
discussing it on the mailing-list and Ack by Andrew Victor, I 
send you this patchset. You can pull it from:

  git://github.com/at91linux/linux-2.6-at91.git for-rmk

And you will receive:

Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD (2):
      at91: remove not needed depends on
      at91: Kconfig simplification

Nicolas Ferre (2):
      at91: at91sam9g20ek modify dual slot evaluation kit
      atmel_lcdfb Kconfig: remove long dependency line

 arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig                     |  107 ++++++++++++++----------
 arch/arm/mach-at91/board-sam9g20ek-2slot-mmc.c |   23 ++++--
 arch/avr32/Kconfig                             |    1 +
 drivers/video/Kconfig                          |    5 +-
 4 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)

The patch
"at91: at91sam9g20ek modify dual slot evaluation kit"
is also already sent directly to Linus for .32-final (not 
sure it can reach). Anyway, I guess that git can handle 
that...

Thanks. Best regards,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre

[GIT PULL] AT91 Kconfig rework

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 04:30:51PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Hi Russell,
> 
> This is AT91 Kconfig rework for next merge window. After 
> discussing it on the mailing-list and Ack by Andrew Victor, I 
> send you this patchset. You can pull it from:
> 
>   git://github.com/at91linux/linux-2.6-at91.git for-rmk

FYI:

$ git pull git://github.com/at91linux/linux-2.6-at91.git for-rmk
remote: Counting objects: 41, done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (28/28), done.
remote: Total 30 (delta 26), reused 2 (delta 2)
Unpacking objects: 100% (30/30), done.

>From bogus@does.not.exist.com  Fri Nov  6 13:01:15 2009
From: bogus@does.not.exist.com ()
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:01:15 -0000
Subject: No subject
Message-ID: <mailman.49.1258671701.2170.linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>

Auto-merging arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
Recorded preimage for 'arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig'
Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.
$ git diff-files -u
diff --cc arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
index 2fd8843,3df124e..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
@@@ -320,7 -337,7 +337,11 @@@ config MACH_AT91SAM9G20E
  
  config MACH_AT91SAM9G20EK_2MMC
  	bool "Atmel AT91SAM9G20-EK Evaluation Kit with 2 SD/MMC Slots"
++<<<<<<< HEAD:arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
 +	depends on ARCH_AT91SAM9G20
++=======
+ 	select HAVE_NAND_ATMEL_BUSWIDTH_16
++>>>>>>> 0912e5359f89f303f53fd4874dadab77a4949a8a:arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
  	help
  	  Select this if you are using an Atmel AT91SAM9G20-EK Evaluation Kit
  	  with 2 SD/MMC Slots. This is the case for AT91SAM9G20-EK rev. C and
@@@ -394,7 -411,7 +415,11 @@@ config MTD_AT91_DATAFLASH_CAR
  
  config MTD_NAND_ATMEL_BUSWIDTH_16
  	bool "Enable 16-bit data bus interface to NAND flash"
++<<<<<<< HEAD:arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
 +	depends on (MACH_AT91SAM9260EK || MACH_AT91SAM9261EK || MACH_AT91SAM9G10EK || MACH_AT91SAM9263EK || MACH_AT91SAM9G20EK || MACH_AT91SAM9G20EK_2MMC || MACH_AT91SAM9G45EKES || MACH_AT91CAP9ADK)
++=======
+ 	depends on HAVE_NAND_ATMEL_BUSWIDTH_16
++>>>>>>> 0912e5359f89f303f53fd4874dadab77a4949a8a:arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
  	help
  	  On AT91SAM926x boards both types of NAND flash can be present
  	  (8 and 16 bit data bus width).

What's the resolution?  I think the first is just to include both, but
the second looks like the first depends needs deleting to leave only the
second?

[GIT PULL] AT91 Kconfig rework

[Nicolas Ferre]

Russell King - ARM Linux :
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 04:30:51PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>> Hi Russell,
>>
>> This is AT91 Kconfig rework for next merge window. After 
>> discussing it on the mailing-list and Ack by Andrew Victor, I 
>> send you this patchset. You can pull it from:
>>
>>   git://github.com/at91linux/linux-2.6-at91.git for-rmk
> 
> FYI:
> 
> $ git pull git://github.com/at91linux/linux-2.6-at91.git for-rmk
> remote: Counting objects: 41, done.
> remote: Compressing objects: 100% (28/28), done.
> remote: Total 30 (delta 26), reused 2 (delta 2)
> Unpacking objects: 100% (30/30), done.
>>From git://github.com/at91linux/linux-2.6-at91
>  * branch            for-rmk    -> FETCH_HEAD
> Auto-merging arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> Recorded preimage for 'arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig'
> Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.
> $ git diff-files -u
> diff --cc arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> index 2fd8843,3df124e..0000000
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> @@@ -320,7 -337,7 +337,11 @@@ config MACH_AT91SAM9G20E
>   
>   config MACH_AT91SAM9G20EK_2MMC
>   	bool "Atmel AT91SAM9G20-EK Evaluation Kit with 2 SD/MMC Slots"
> ++<<<<<<< HEAD:arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
>  +	depends on ARCH_AT91SAM9G20
> ++=======
> + 	select HAVE_NAND_ATMEL_BUSWIDTH_16
> ++>>>>>>> 0912e5359f89f303f53fd4874dadab77a4949a8a:arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
>   	help
>   	  Select this if you are using an Atmel AT91SAM9G20-EK Evaluation Kit
>   	  with 2 SD/MMC Slots. This is the case for AT91SAM9G20-EK rev. C and
> @@@ -394,7 -411,7 +415,11 @@@ config MTD_AT91_DATAFLASH_CAR
>   
>   config MTD_NAND_ATMEL_BUSWIDTH_16
>   	bool "Enable 16-bit data bus interface to NAND flash"
> ++<<<<<<< HEAD:arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
>  +	depends on (MACH_AT91SAM9260EK || MACH_AT91SAM9261EK || MACH_AT91SAM9G10EK || MACH_AT91SAM9263EK || MACH_AT91SAM9G20EK || MACH_AT91SAM9G20EK_2MMC || MACH_AT91SAM9G45EKES || MACH_AT91CAP9ADK)
> ++=======
> + 	depends on HAVE_NAND_ATMEL_BUSWIDTH_16
> ++>>>>>>> 0912e5359f89f303f53fd4874dadab77a4949a8a:arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
>   	help
>   	  On AT91SAM926x boards both types of NAND flash can be present
>   	  (8 and 16 bit data bus width).
> 
> What's the resolution?  I think the first is just to include both, but
> the second looks like the first depends needs deleting to leave only the
> second?

Well, in fact the resolution for both is to keep the second line only.

Thanks.

Best regards,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre