From: jic23@cam.ac.uk (Jonathan Cameron)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] pcmcia: Fix additional platforms after removal of skt->irq in 66024db57d5b9011e274b314affad68f370c0d6f
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:31:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B19395C.8070609@cam.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B193887.8090608@cam.ac.uk>
Actually, sorry for the noise. Please hold off on this one, there are more
problems due to the same patch set. Should have waited for the compile to finish!
Jonathan
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>
> ---
>
> Russell's original patch is currently in linux-next (and hence I'm
> guessing heading for the merge window?). In the intervening time,
> 2 platforms have been added using the now nonexistent skt-irq.
> This patch fixes them as per the other platforms.
>
> drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_palmtc.c | 2 +-
> drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_stargate2.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_palmtc.c b/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_palmtc.c
> index 3a8993e..459a232 100644
> --- a/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_palmtc.c
> +++ b/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_palmtc.c
> @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ static int palmtc_pcmcia_hw_init(struct soc_pcmcia_socket *skt)
> if (ret)
> goto err7;
>
> - skt->irq = IRQ_GPIO(GPIO_NR_PALMTC_PCMCIA_READY);
> + skt->socket.pci_irq = IRQ_GPIO(GPIO_NR_PALMTC_PCMCIA_READY);
> return 0;
>
> err7:
> diff --git a/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_stargate2.c b/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_stargate2.c
> index 490749e..d08802f 100644
> --- a/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_stargate2.c
> +++ b/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_stargate2.c
> @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ static struct pcmcia_irqs irqs[] = {
>
> static int sg2_pcmcia_hw_init(struct soc_pcmcia_socket *skt)
> {
> - skt->irq = IRQ_GPIO(SG2_S0_GPIO_READY);
> + skt->socket.pci_irq = IRQ_GPIO(SG2_S0_GPIO_READY);
> return soc_pcmcia_request_irqs(skt, irqs, ARRAY_SIZE(irqs));
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-04 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-27 23:11 [RFC PATCH 01/10] PCMCIA: soc_common: convert to a stand alone module Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-10-27 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 02/10] PCMCIA: soc_common: provide single socket add/remove functionality Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-10-27 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 03/10] PCMCIA: soc_common: push socket removal down to SoC specific support Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-10-27 23:12 ` [RFC PATCH 04/10] PCMCIA: soc_common: push socket probe down into " Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-10-27 23:12 ` [RFC PATCH 05/10] PCMCIA: sa1111: wrap soc_pcmcia_socket to contain sa1111 specific data Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-10-27 23:12 ` [RFC PATCH 06/10] PCMCIA: sa1111: remove duplicated initializers Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-10-27 23:12 ` [RFC PATCH 07/10] PCMCIA: soc_common: constify soc_pcmcia_socket ops member Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-10-27 23:13 ` [RFC PATCH 08/10] PCMCIA: soc_common: remove 'dev' member from soc_pcmcia_socket Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-10-27 23:13 ` [RFC PATCH 09/10] PCMCIA: ss: allow PCI IRQs > 255 Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-10-27 23:13 ` [RFC PATCH 10/10] PCMCIA: stop duplicating pci_irq in soc_pcmcia_socket Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-12-04 16:27 ` [PATCH] pcmcia: Fix additional platforms after removal of skt->irq in 66024db57d5b9011e274b314affad68f370c0d6f Jonathan Cameron
2009-12-04 16:31 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2009-10-27 23:18 ` [RFC PATCH 00/10] PCMCIA soc_common re-factorization Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-10-27 23:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-10-28 8:44 ` Wolfram Sang
2009-10-28 21:25 ` Dominik Brodowski
2009-10-29 17:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-11-02 17:21 ` Dominik Brodowski
2009-12-04 17:18 ` [RFC PATCH 01/10] PCMCIA: soc_common: convert to a stand alone module Jonathan Cameron
2009-12-04 17:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-12-05 9:56 ` Dominik Brodowski
2009-12-05 10:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-12-05 11:04 ` Dominik Brodowski
2009-12-05 11:29 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B19395C.8070609@cam.ac.uk \
--to=jic23@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).