linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: armando.visconti@st.com (Armando VISCONTI)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: QUERY: How to handle SOC Configuration (Peripheral	Multiplexing) in linux
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:10:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B9E078C.4010706@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B9DF966.6050504@st.com>

Shiraz,

>> If you do it thru Kconfig still it would be fixed a compilation time.
>> Do you agree or am I missing something?
>>     
>
> yes, and if you see, should any one require it dynamically? Each user 
> would have his own board with static devices. This configuration (of 
> selecting multiplexed devices) depends on his board configuration, which
> is the responsibility of the board configuration file.
>   
This was also my understanding at the beginning.
But looking at the response from the community it
looks that it is better to have a single image for all boards
which is capable at runtime to be configured in the proper way.

>> So, probably the correct way is passing peripheral selection information
>> thru
>> bootargs.
>> What do you think?
>>     
>
> This is very specific to how an SoC provides multiplexing options and will
> vary greatly. Which option of bootargs are you talking about?
>   
Of course not a standard bootargs option.
I was more talking about a new specific option that is
passed thru bootargs and directed to a specific SPEAr function that
can apply the proper cfg and register setting, like someone (Ben?)
was suggesting.

In this option you should pass a bitmap or something like that.

Let me know your opinion on it.

Armando




Shiraz HASHIM wrote:
> Armando,
>
> On 3/15/2010 2:12 PM, Armando VISCONTI wrote:
>   
>>> Now, For this we need some interface or channel through which we provide
>>> this information to kernel. This is what precisely i have done. The
>>> channel i
>>> provided is through Kconfig and the function "s300_configure", accepts
>>> this bitmap and configures hardware.
>>>   
>>>       
>> I'm not getting this point.
>>     
>
> yes, Actually this is what we are saying. Seemingly the best option is
> to do it during compilation time, except if we have some standard way
> at booting.
>
>   
>> If you do it thru Kconfig still it would be fixed a compilation time.
>> Do you agree or am I missing something?
>>     
>
> yes, and if you see, should any one require it dynamically? Each user 
> would have his own board with static devices. This configuration (of 
> selecting multiplexed devices) depends on his board configuration, which
> is the responsibility of the board configuration file.
>
>   
>> So, probably the correct way is passing peripheral selection information
>> thru
>> bootargs.
>> What do you think?
>>     
>
> This is very specific to how an SoC provides multiplexing options and will
> vary greatly. Which option of bootargs are you talking about?
>
> regards
> Shiraz
>   


-- 
-- "Every step appears to be the unavoidable consequence of the
-- preceding one." (A. Einstein) 
-- 
Armando Visconti                  Mobile: (+39) 346 8879146
Senior SW Engineer                Fax:    (+39) 02 93519290
CPG                               Work:   (+39) 02 93519683
Computer System Division          e-mail: armando.visconti at st.com
ST Microelectronics               TINA:   051  4683
                                    
 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-03-15 10:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-15  4:31 QUERY: How to handle SOC Configuration (Peripheral Multiplexing) in linux Viresh KUMAR
2010-03-15  4:47 ` jassi brar
2010-03-15  5:14   ` Shiraz HASHIM
2010-03-15  5:41     ` jassi brar
2010-03-15  6:32       ` Viresh KUMAR
2010-03-15  6:46         ` jassi brar
2010-03-15 12:55         ` Bill Gatliff
2010-03-15 13:15         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-03-15 13:22           ` Bill Gatliff
2010-03-16  2:01           ` jassi brar
2010-03-15 12:52     ` Bill Gatliff
2010-03-15 16:02       ` Armando VISCONTI
2010-03-15 16:53         ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-03-15 16:53         ` Bill Gatliff
2010-03-15 17:09           ` Mark Brown
2010-03-15 18:57             ` Tony Lindgren
2010-03-15 18:58               ` Bill Gatliff
2010-03-15 16:58         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-03-15  4:57 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2010-03-15  5:15   ` Shiraz HASHIM
2010-03-15  5:28     ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2010-03-15  6:34       ` Viresh KUMAR
2010-03-15  6:20 ` Ben Dooks
2010-03-15  6:28   ` Viresh KUMAR
2010-03-15  8:42     ` Armando VISCONTI
2010-03-15  9:09       ` Shiraz HASHIM
2010-03-15  9:37         ` jassi brar
2010-03-15 10:22           ` Shiraz HASHIM
2010-03-15 10:34             ` jassi brar
2010-03-15 10:55               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-03-15 10:37             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-03-15 10:10         ` Armando VISCONTI [this message]
2010-03-15 10:27           ` Shiraz HASHIM
2010-03-15  7:06   ` Viresh KUMAR
2010-03-17 16:30     ` Ben Dooks
2010-03-19  4:45       ` Viresh KUMAR
2010-03-15 17:55 ` Linus Walleij
2010-03-16 13:39   ` Shiraz HASHIM
2010-03-16 21:55     ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B9E078C.4010706@st.com \
    --to=armando.visconti@st.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).