linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: andy@warmcat.com (Andy Green)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Device probe order (i2c regulator vs. platform device)
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:50:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BAA0AA6.80902@warmcat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <005501cacb42$c5bbcde0$513369a0$%szyprowski@samsung.com>

On 03/24/10 11:11, Somebody in the thread at some point said:

Hi -

> Right, this is a really common case. Maybe this callback could be added
> to the regulator framework as well?
>
> On the other hand a more generic solution might be needed, because besides
> the PMU there might be some other dependences between various devices that
> not possible to be ensured in the current framework (I'm thinking of v4l2
> subdevs that link 2 separate devices together, but currently are used only
> with i2c clients).

Right, it's a generic issue with needing to delay other device 
registration until something else has completed probe, not just PMU. 
PMU is just the most common parent.

A callback is needed after probe() returned without error somehow.

-Andy

  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-24 12:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-24  7:10 Device probe order (i2c regulator vs. platform device) Marek Szyprowski
2010-03-24  9:19 ` Andy Green
2010-03-24 11:11   ` Marek Szyprowski
2010-03-24 12:50     ` Andy Green [this message]
2010-03-24 13:11       ` Mark Brown
2010-03-24 13:22         ` Andy Green
2010-03-24 11:32   ` Mark Brown
2010-03-24 12:11     ` Andy Green
2010-03-24 14:01       ` Mark Brown
2010-03-24 14:38         ` Andy Green
2010-03-25 10:22           ` Mark Brown
2010-03-25 10:52             ` Andy Green
2010-03-24 10:21 ` Mark Brown
2010-03-24 10:57   ` Andy Green
2010-03-24 11:02   ` Marek Szyprowski
2010-03-24 11:08     ` Mark Brown
2010-03-24 11:27       ` Andy Green
2010-03-24 12:19         ` Mark Brown
2010-03-24 12:29           ` Andy Green

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BAA0AA6.80902@warmcat.com \
    --to=andy@warmcat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).