From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre) Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 11:57:17 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] atmel_serial: Atmel RS485 support v2 In-Reply-To: <4BFE2F38.8050200@evidence.eu.com> References: <4BB053C4.7050700@evidence.eu.com> <4BB10304.6090006@bluewatersys.com> <4BB1BF49.2000609@evidence.eu.com> <4BB252E3.3030703@bluewatersys.com> <4BBD8C9D.3070401@evidence.eu.com> <20100408111310.524f7354@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <4BBDD71D.1010700@evidence.eu.com> <4BFD1FB6.8050405@atmel.com> <4BFE2F38.8050200@evidence.eu.com> Message-ID: <4BFE41FD.2080804@atmel.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Le 27/05/2010 10:37, Claudio Scordino : > Nicolas Ferre ha scritto: >> Le 08/04/2010 15:16, Claudio Scordino : >> >> [..] >> >> >>> atmel_serial: Atmel RS485 support >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Claudio Scordino >>> Signed-off-by: Michael Trimarchi >>> Signed-off-by: Rick Bronson >>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Heutling >>> Tested-by: Sebastian Heutling >>> Reviewed-by: Ryan Mallon >>> >> >> Even though I personally did not test this patch I think it is time to >> go forward with this very good work. >> >> Considering the number of people involved in this testing and review I >> think that we can submit this patch for mainline. Who will handle it? >> - do we submit to ARM or serial subsystem ? >> > > Hi Nicolas, > > the latest version of the patch has been already merged in the > latest Linus' git tree through Russell King's patchsystem My fault: I use to check Russell patchsystem with "AT91" searching string and not "atmel" ;-) > (the maintainer of the driver never answered to emails...). I was supposed to take over its maintainance one year ago but did not find time to do it. My fault here also... Anyway, it was the occasion to tell all of you that this RS485 support is a nice job and that even if I do not answer, I try to track all interesting activity in the background. Best regards, -- Nicolas Ferre