From: fachkar.datawind@gmail.com (f. achkar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: defining ARM machine type properly
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 10:53:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BFE8775.4000200@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTilhxt5hVjffJMRPzN477Czw2_Xtqo2joYvo1vM3@mail.gmail.com>
On 05/26/2010 11:14 PM, Wan ZongShun wrote:
> 2010/5/27 f. achkar <fachkar.datawind@gmail.com>:
>
>> hi,
>> I'm trying to port smdk2450 arch to the a new kernel 2.6.32-9, I did the
>> initial work as per various googled documents, but somehow the current
>> initial Image is failing at arch/arm/kernel/head-common.S :
>> '__lookup_processor_type', and eventually goes to '__error_a' of the
>>
> The '__lookup_processor_type' goes to '__error_a' is not related to
> your machine_type,
> you should check whether there is a true definition of select
> CPU_ARMxx in the arch/arm/kconfig.
>
Symbol: MACH_SMDK2450
[=y]
?
? Prompt:
SMDK2450
?
? Defined at
arch/arm/mach-s3c2450/Kconfig:30
?
? Depends on:
ARCH_S3C2410
?
?
Location:
?
? -> System
Type
?
? -> S3C2450
Machines
?
? Selects: CPU_S3C2450 && MACH_SMDK
> The issue maybe result from you get a wrong ARM processor type
> number,which is not equal to
> the R9 resigster value.
>
most likely the case, what should be my check-list to verify correct doing?
thanks,
>
>> same file! this seems to be related to the definition of machine_type as
>> defined in :
>> include/asm-arm/mach-types.h and arch/arm/tools/mach-types*
>> I checked where the definition goes in include/asm-arm/mach-types.h by
>> inserting
>> #error 2223XX
>> into various parts of that header and seems fine at the point.
>> nevertheless I'm not 100 sure
>> I wonder if the is a definitive reference to guide in this matter,
>> better yet a check-list like procedure??
>> thanks,
>> ferar
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>>
>>
>
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-27 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-26 21:11 defining ARM machine type properly f. achkar
2010-05-27 1:07 ` Ben Dooks
2010-05-27 14:29 ` f. achkar
2010-05-27 15:08 ` f. achkar
2010-05-28 1:08 ` Ben Dooks
2010-05-27 3:14 ` Wan ZongShun
2010-05-27 14:53 ` f. achkar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BFE8775.4000200@gmail.com \
--to=fachkar.datawind@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).