From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mcuelenaere@gmail.com (Maurus Cuelenaere)
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 18:18:52 +0200
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/3] sdhci-s3c: Add SDHCI_QUIRK_NO_WP_BIT quirk for
	Samsung SoC
In-Reply-To: <000d01cb2d83$16b7efb0$4427cf10$%kim@samsung.com>
References: <1279886191-9197-1-git-send-email-kgene.kim@samsung.com>
	<1279886191-9197-4-git-send-email-kgene.kim@samsung.com>
	<4C49871D.8030702@gmail.com>
	<000d01cb2d83$16b7efb0$4427cf10$%kim@samsung.com>
Message-ID: <4C4F06EC.2020902@gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

 Op 27-07-10 13:58, Kukjin Kim schreef:
> Maurus Cuelenaere wrote:
>>  Op 23-07-10 13:56, Kukjin Kim schreef:
>>> From: Hyuk Lee <hyuk1.lee@samsung.com>
>>>
>>> If host controller doesn't have WP pin which should be connnected with SDMMC
>>> card WP pin, can implement get_ro function with using the allocated gpio.
>>> In order to use this quirk wp_gpio in the platform data must be set.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Hyuk Lee <hyuk1.lee@samsung.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c |   43
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c     |    3 ++
>>>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h     |    3 ++
>>>  3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c
>>> index 0d25285..0b75e57 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c
>>> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>>>
>>>  #include <linux/mmc/host.h>
>>>
>>> +#include <plat/gpio-cfg.h>
>>>  #include <plat/sdhci.h>
>>>  #include <plat/regs-sdhci.h>
>>>
>>> @@ -213,6 +214,36 @@ static void sdhci_s3c_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host,
>> unsigned int clock)
>>>  }
>>>
>>>  /**
>>> + * sdhci_s3c_get_ro - callback for get_ro
>>> + * @host: The SDHCI host being changed
>>> + *
>>> + * If the WP pin is connected with GPIO, can get the value which indicates
>>> + * the card is locked or not.
>>> +*/
>>> +static int sdhci_s3c_get_ro(struct mmc_host *mmc)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct sdhci_s3c *sc;
>>> +	struct sdhci_host *host;
>>> +
>>> +	host = mmc_priv(mmc);
>>> +	sc = sdhci_priv(host);
>> This can be done as static initializer if you reverse the order above.
> Could you please kindly explain about this?
> Sorry, I cannot get the exactly meaning...

+static int sdhci_s3c_get_ro(struct mmc_host *mmc)
+{
+	struct sdhci_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
+	struct sdhci_s3c *sc = sdhci_priv(host);



-- 
Maurus Cuelenaere