From: ben@simtec.co.uk (Ben Dooks)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: Samsung SoC: clksrc-clk: wait for the stable SRC/DIV status.
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 18:25:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C50681B.8040306@simtec.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1280287044-6645-1-git-send-email-myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
On 28/07/10 04:17, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
> Many MUX and clock dividers have a status bit so that users can wait
> until the status is stable. When corresponding registers are accessed
> while a clock is not stable, we may suffer from unexpected errors.
>
> Therefore, we introduce a mechanism to let the operations related with
> updating SRC/DIV registers of clksrc-clk wait for the stabilization:
> clk_set_parent, clk_set_rate.
>
> In order to use this feature, the definition of clksrc_clk should
> include reg_src_stable or reg_div_stable. With effective rec_src_stable
> values, clk_set_parent returns with a stabilized SRC register and
> with effective rec_div_stable values, clk_set_rate returns with a
> stabilized DIV register. If .reg field is null, its (either SRC or DIV)
> register's status is not checked and returned without waiting; i.e.,
> some MUX/DIV may not need this feature.
>
> When setting reg_*_stable, .size is used to tell the value of "stable".
> If .size = 0, the stable status is 0 and if .size = 1, the stable status
> is 1.
>
> Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/plat-samsung/clock-clksrc.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/clock-clksrc.h | 10 ++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/clock-clksrc.c b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/clock-clksrc.c
> index 46d204a..5ff17ad 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/clock-clksrc.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/clock-clksrc.c
> @@ -68,6 +68,12 @@ static int s3c_setrate_clksrc(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
> val |= (div - 1) << sclk->reg_div.shift;
> __raw_writel(val, reg);
>
> + if (sclk->reg_div_stable.reg) {
> + do { } while (((__raw_readl(sclk->reg_div_stable.reg) >>
> + sclk->reg_div_stable.shift) & 1)
> + != sclk->reg_div_stable.size);
> + }
> +
> return 0;
> }
you could move the code for this out to a separate inlined function to
avoid it being here twice, and possibly make it flow better.
> @@ -93,6 +99,13 @@ static int s3c_setparent_clksrc(struct clk *clk, struct clk *parent)
> clksrc |= src_nr << sclk->reg_src.shift;
>
> __raw_writel(clksrc, sclk->reg_src.reg);
> +
> + if (sclk->reg_src_stable.reg) {
> + do { } while (((__raw_readl(sclk->reg_src_stable.reg) >>
> + sclk->reg_src_stable.shift) & 1)
> + != sclk->reg_src_stable.size);
> + }
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/clock-clksrc.h b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/clock-clksrc.h
> index 50a8ca7..282821d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/clock-clksrc.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/clock-clksrc.h
> @@ -45,6 +45,13 @@ struct clksrc_reg {
> * @sources: the sources for this clock
> * @reg_src: the register definition for selecting the clock's source
> * @reg_div: the register definition for the clock's output divisor
> + * @reg_src_stable: the register definition to probe if reg_src is
> + * stabilized after the update of reg_src. It is "stabilized" if
> + * reg[shift] == size. If reg == NULL, this stable reg is not looked
> + * up. Thus, in S5PV210, size is usually 0.
> + * @reg_div_stable: the register definition to probe if reg_div is
> + * stabilized after the update of reg_div. Same mechanism with
> + * reg_src_stable.
> *
> * This clock implements the features required by the newer SoCs where
> * the standard clock block provides an input mux and a post-mux divisor
> @@ -61,6 +68,9 @@ struct clksrc_clk {
>
> struct clksrc_reg reg_src;
> struct clksrc_reg reg_div;
> +
> + struct clksrc_reg reg_src_stable;
> + struct clksrc_reg reg_div_stable;
> };
>
> /**
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-28 17:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-28 3:17 [PATCH] ARM: Samsung SoC: clksrc-clk: wait for the stable SRC/DIV status MyungJoo Ham
2010-07-28 17:25 ` Ben Dooks [this message]
2010-07-29 5:07 ` MyungJoo Ham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C50681B.8040306@simtec.co.uk \
--to=ben@simtec.co.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).