From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: augulis.darius@gmail.com (Darius Augulis)
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2010 14:04:35 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] s3c: add support for mach-real6410
In-Reply-To: <4C5BE71A.6040106@gmail.com>
References: <20100806101914.2481.67766.stgit@darius-desktop>	<20100806102041.2481.18980.stgit@darius-desktop>
	<4C5BE71A.6040106@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4C5BEC43.2080001@gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 08/06/2010 01:42 PM, Paulius Zaleckas wrote:
> On 08/06/2010 01:21 PM, Darius Augulis wrote:
>> Add support for CoreWind Real6410 board,
>> based on Samsung s3c6410 processor.
>>
>> Changelog:
>> * It's renamed patch '[PATCH v2] Support for Real6410'
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Darius Augulis<augulis.darius@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/Kconfig | 6 ++
>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/Makefile | 1
>> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-real6410.c | 86
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-real6410.c
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/Kconfig
>> b/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/Kconfig
>> index f5a5972..0f9f2dd 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/Kconfig
>> @@ -88,6 +88,12 @@ config MACH_ANW6410
>> help
>> Machine support for the A&W6410
>>
>> +config MACH_REAL6410
>> + bool "REAL6410"
>> + select CPU_S3C6410
>> + help
>> + Machine support for the CoreWind REAL6410
>> +
>> config MACH_SMDK6410
>> bool "SMDK6410"
>> select CPU_S3C6410
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/Makefile
>> b/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/Makefile
>> index 9d10069..6be3e5b 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/Makefile
>> @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PM) += irq-pm.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_ANW6410) += mach-anw6410.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_SMDK6400) += mach-smdk6400.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_SMDK6410) += mach-smdk6410.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_REAL6410) += mach-real6410.o
>
> Use TAB instead of spaces here ^^^^^

ok, I have fixed version.
Kukjin, could you review these patches and merge into your branch 
for-next? Should I re-send this patch if there is only this minor issue?