From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tanmay.upadhyay@einfochips.com (Tanmay Upadhyay) Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 05:21:28 -0000 Subject: [PATCH v2] OpenRD: Enable SD/UART selection for serial port 1 In-Reply-To: <20100810115351.GL21175@chipmunk> References: <1281428973-28957-1-git-send-email-tanmay.upadhyay@einfochips.com> <20100810085643.GE21175@chipmunk> <20100810085821.GF21175@chipmunk> <4C612856.6090405@einfochips.com> <20100810102817.GJ21175@chipmunk> <4C612EEC.3090409@einfochips.com> <20100810115351.GL21175@chipmunk> Message-ID: <4C62338F.8080102@einfochips.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 08/10/2010 05:23 PM, Alexander Clouter wrote: > Hi, > > * Tanmay Upadhyay [2010-08-10 16:20:20+0530]: > >> On 08/10/2010 03:58 PM, Alexander Clouter wrote: >> >>> * Tanmay Upadhyay [2010-08-10 15:52:14+0530]: >>> >>> >>>> Intention here is to provide SD support by default. It will be switched >>>> to UART mode only if someone asks to do so via kernel parameter. If >>>> someone doesn't give OR gives improper kernel parameter, he/she won't get >>>> UART1. It will simply fall-back to the default setting - which is SD >>>> support. >>>> >>> My mis-type, I forgot to put a >>> 'kirkwood_sdio_init(&openrd_mvsdio_data);' after my added printk(). >>> >>> >> If I understood correctly, intention behind this is to inform user that >> he/she made a mistake while passing the kernel parameters. Is this >> correct? >> >> > Exactly, and there is no harm turning on the SD slot rather than UART1 > at the same time. > > Cheers > > Sent version 3 to the list. -- Tanmay -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: