From: mfuzzey@gmail.com (Martin Fuzzey)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Problem with non aligned DMA in usbnet on ARM
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 00:20:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C632217.9000608@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100811203505.GA463@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
[Gary, you forgot to copy -usb and netdev so adding them again to try to
keep this thread joined up]
Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 08:54:27AM -0700, Gary King wrote:
>
>> I sent a patch to the list about 2 weeks ago that added support to
>> DMA bounce to bounce for misaligned buffers. We have a similar
>> problem with URB alignment for usbnet on Tegra's HCD:
>> http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20100729.005746.b43fa1d9.en.html
>>
Nice to know someone else has the same problem :)
What is the Tegra hcd?
I can't find it in the kernel sources.
> We don't want to add support for this to DMA bounce. DMA bounce is already
> a pain in the backside and causes its own set of problems - please let it
> die a long slow but quite death.
>
> If you want to see the kind of pain dmabounce causes, look at this long
> standing and as yet unsolved bug:
>
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7760
>
>
Well I don't know the dmabounce code but why is using it likely to cause
OOM problems (at least why more so than copying the buffer in the HCD or
the usb core). In both cases there will be two copies of the buffer in
memory which could I agree be a problem in memory constrained systems.
But if we _do_ want to accept unaligned buffers from usb drivers I can't
see a way round that.
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-11 22:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-11 9:41 Problem with non aligned DMA in usbnet on ARM Martin Fuzzey
2010-08-11 9:54 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-08-11 10:11 ` Martin Fuzzey
2010-08-11 15:04 ` Greg KH
2010-08-11 16:08 ` Martin Fuzzey
2010-08-11 17:42 ` Greg KH
2010-08-11 19:07 ` Martin Fuzzey
2010-08-11 20:13 ` Greg KH
2010-08-11 22:31 ` Martin Fuzzey
2010-08-12 17:01 ` Matthieu CASTET
2010-08-11 19:10 ` Oliver Neukum
2010-08-11 9:59 ` Matthieu CASTET
2010-08-11 11:38 ` Martin Fuzzey
2010-08-11 15:54 ` Gary King
2010-08-11 20:35 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-08-11 22:20 ` Martin Fuzzey [this message]
2010-08-11 22:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-08-12 17:08 ` Matthieu CASTET
2010-08-13 10:06 ` Martin Fuzzey
2010-08-13 10:58 ` Oliver Neukum
2010-08-13 13:42 ` David Brownell
2010-08-13 13:53 ` Oliver Neukum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C632217.9000608@gmail.com \
--to=mfuzzey@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).