From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: viresh.kumar@st.com (viresh kumar) Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 15:47:57 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 16/74] ST SPEAr: adding support for synopsis i2c designware In-Reply-To: <20100907094424.GD30509@game.jcrosoft.org> References: <72ad657ab3eb9d61f11741145494eadb061926b9.1283161023.git.viresh.kumar@st.com> <20100906231227.GG8153@game.jcrosoft.org> <4C85B94E.3040307@st.com> <20100907041250.GC30509@game.jcrosoft.org> <4C860307.7040409@st.com> <20100907094424.GD30509@game.jcrosoft.org> Message-ID: <4C861155.8050708@st.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 9/7/2010 3:14 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 14:46 Tue 07 Sep , viresh kumar wrote: >> > On 9/7/2010 9:42 AM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: >>> > > please split your v2 patch series in related changset it will simplify the >>> > > review >> > >> > Jean, >> > >> > I would prefer not to do this change in current series due to following reasons: >> > - Would make difficult for reviewers to locate V2 for V1 they have reviewed. >> > - My patches are intermixed, so would be difficult for me to create related >> > change sets as currently patches are very much intermixed. >> > >> > I will take care of this next time i send another patch series. > It's really difficult to reiew it and take long time > so reduce the number of patch and by related changeset will help a lot Jean: I agree with what you are saying, but doing it in current patch series will be difficult. Russell: Can we go ahead with a single patch set this time. By next time we will take care of this. viresh.