From: tim.nordell@logicpd.com (Tim Nordell)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: Modified omap_mux_init_signal() to take in const char *
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:10:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CC09042.3000201@logicpd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1287687041-22377-1-git-send-email-tim.nordell@logicpd.com>
On 10/21/10 13:50, Tim Nordell wrote:
> If one does the following line twice with the old code:
>
> omap_mux_init_signal("uart3_rts_sd.gpio_164", OMAP_PIN_INPUT);
> omap_mux_init_signal("uart3_rts_sd.gpio_164", OMAP_PIN_INPUT);
>
> the compiler optimizes the two const strings into one string
> internally in the compiler. The old code would modify the string
> by inserting a NULL effectively making the second call become:
>
> omap_mux_init_signal("uart3_rts_sd", OMAP_PIN_INPUT);
>
> Since the code changes _all_ uart3_rts_sd signals over to this,
> it'll cause unknown behavior, as well as making it more
> difficult to track down the reason since the string
> "uart3_rts_sd" by itself may not actually exist in your
> normal mux initialization sequence.
>
Gah. I just realized there was a patch in the linux-omap tree to do the
same thing.
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=5a3b2f7a5a79082dd3a5f2294cbd85fc3b173d98;hp=7ad0e386d46e9edff64705ab25337ad9130baf63
It looks like by inspection that there could be a couple of things wrong
with that patch however. Namely, on the comparison of muxname to
m0_entry, if they have the same string up to mode0_len, such as
"dss_data1" and "dss_data12" it'd match there prematurely as it'd stop
comparing. Also, a minor display issue on the printk of the new muxname.
- Tim
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-21 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-21 18:50 [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: Modified omap_mux_init_signal() to take in const char * Tim Nordell
2010-10-21 19:10 ` Tim Nordell [this message]
2010-10-22 17:21 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CC09042.3000201@logicpd.com \
--to=tim.nordell@logicpd.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).