From: eric@eukrea.com (Eric Bénard)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: imx: Add mx53 support to common msl functions.
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 21:30:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CD317E2.9090504@eukrea.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86A0E76937111F4C92FABEC0A20988510523CEC2@az33exm21>
Hi Dinh,
Le 04/11/2010 20:21, Nguyen Dinh-R00091 a ?crit :
> Reading the ROM code is probably the most reliable way to get the correct
> silicon revision. Because the ROM that is on the chip is "most likely"
> up-to-date with the silicon. "Most likely" means that 95% of the time, when
> you get a new silicon, the ROM code will get updated. There is still a
> chance that a new silicon will not require a ROM update.
>
> Also the other reason is that sometimes the fuses that identify the silicon
> revision that are used by the IIM are sometimes not blown to reflect the
> correct revision in pre-production parts. MX51 is a post production part,
> so in theory, the fuses are blown correctly. But since we made MX51 boards
> available prior to going into production, reading from the IIM is not as
> reliable as reading the ROM.
>
Don't you think we should use the documented register which (if we believe the
documentation) should be 100% reliable for production CPU instead of this
undocumented method which from what you say is 95% reliable and here to handle
the case of pre production CPU ?
The same problem occured on i.MX35 silicon 2.1 which where not correctly
detected using the ROM code.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-04 20:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-02 22:17 [PATCH 1/2] ARM: imx: Add core definitions for MX53 Dinh.Nguyen at freescale.com
2010-11-02 22:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: imx: Add mx53 support to common msl functions Dinh.Nguyen at freescale.com
2010-11-02 22:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-11-03 9:15 ` Eric Bénard
2010-11-04 19:21 ` Nguyen Dinh-R00091
2010-11-04 20:30 ` Eric Bénard [this message]
2010-11-04 21:24 ` Nguyen Dinh-R00091
2010-11-04 21:30 ` Nguyen Dinh-R00091
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CD317E2.9090504@eukrea.com \
--to=eric@eukrea.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).