From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 13:58:15 -0700
Subject: [PATCHv2 2/3] ARM: Allow machines to override __delay()
In-Reply-To: <1288899002.21823.3.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com>
References: <1288300770-18350-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org>	
	<1288300770-18350-3-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org>
	<1288899002.21823.3.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com>
Message-ID: <4CD31E67.60107@codeaurora.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 11/04/2010 12:30 PM, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 14:19 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> +
>> +static void (*delay_fn)(unsigned long) = delay_loop;
>> +
>> +void set_delay_fn(void (*fn)(unsigned long))
>> +{
>> +       delay_fn = fn;
>> +}
>
> This needs to be a static inline in the header file.

Wouldn't that mean delay_fn needs to be exposed in the header file too?
I like the fact that it's static and scoped to this file.

>> +/*
>> + * loops = usecs * HZ * loops_per_jiffy / 1000000
>> + */
>> +void __delay(unsigned long loops)
>> +{
>> +       delay_fn(loops);
>> +}
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(__delay);
>
> Can we make this static inline also? I'm sure about the module issues..

Do you mean in the header file or in this file?

I think it won't work because there actually needs to be a __delay
symbol and it can't just be inlined away at all the call sites.


-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.