From: b-cousson@ti.com (Cousson, Benoit)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/5] OMAP: mailbox: fix rx interrupt disable in omap4
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 15:55:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CEA8473.3040404@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101122100815.GM2446@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com>
On 11/22/2010 11:08 AM, Balbi, Felipe wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 03:50:02PM +0100, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
>> Most of the time, we do not want to use the IP revision because it is
>> un-accurate and does not reflect the change we'd like to track.
>> For example some time a minor change in the RTL that will not impact
>> the SW at all might trigger a change in the IP revision, whereas on
>> the other hand a major bug fix that will impact the SW is not capture
>> in the IP revision... yeah, that's bad, but this can happen.
>>
>> That's why we are relying on a rev field in the hwmod.
>
> But then, what's inside this rev field ? Is it some internal revision of
> hwmod or do you read from the hw ?
So far we are using a artificial SW IP revision that reflect the
difference we'd like to highlight v1, v2.
Benoit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-22 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-18 19:15 [PATCH v3 0/5] OMAP: mailbox: enhancements and fixes Hari Kanigeri
2010-11-18 19:15 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] OMAP: mailbox: change full flag per mailbox queue instead of global Hari Kanigeri
2010-11-18 23:22 ` Cousson, Benoit
2010-11-18 19:15 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] OMAP: mailbox: fix rx interrupt disable in omap4 Hari Kanigeri
2010-11-18 23:28 ` Cousson, Benoit
2010-11-19 0:07 ` Kanigeri, Hari
2010-11-19 8:32 ` Felipe Balbi
2010-11-19 14:22 ` Kanigeri, Hari
2010-11-19 14:50 ` Cousson, Benoit
2010-11-22 10:08 ` Felipe Balbi
2010-11-22 11:46 ` Kanigeri, Hari
2010-11-22 11:51 ` Felipe Balbi
2010-11-22 11:58 ` Kanigeri, Hari
2010-11-22 14:57 ` Cousson, Benoit
2010-11-22 14:55 ` Cousson, Benoit [this message]
2010-11-23 8:10 ` Felipe Balbi
2010-11-19 8:32 ` Felipe Balbi
2010-11-18 19:15 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] OMAP: mailbox: fix checkpatch warnings Hari Kanigeri
2010-11-19 8:33 ` Felipe Balbi
2010-11-19 11:52 ` Kanigeri, Hari
2010-11-18 19:15 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] OMAP: mailbox: send message in process context Hari Kanigeri
2010-11-19 8:34 ` Felipe Balbi
2010-11-18 19:15 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] OMAP: mailbox: add notification support for multiple readers Hari Kanigeri
2010-11-19 8:50 ` Felipe Balbi
2010-11-19 11:50 ` Kanigeri, Hari
2010-11-19 12:09 ` Felipe Balbi
2010-11-19 12:29 ` Kanigeri, Hari
2010-11-19 12:53 ` Felipe Balbi
2010-11-19 13:57 ` Kanigeri, Hari
2010-11-19 14:25 ` Felipe Balbi
2010-11-19 14:44 ` Kanigeri, Hari
2010-11-19 23:07 ` Felipe Balbi
2010-11-20 4:01 ` Kanigeri, Hari
2010-11-20 11:31 ` Felipe Balbi
2010-11-20 13:26 ` Kanigeri, Hari
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CEA8473.3040404@ti.com \
--to=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).