From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: b-cousson@ti.com (Cousson, Benoit) Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 08:55:35 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v7 05/11] OMAP2420: hwmod data: Add GPIO In-Reply-To: References: <1290524213-395-1-git-send-email-charu@ti.com> <1290524213-395-6-git-send-email-charu@ti.com> <4CED8DF7.6040606@ti.com> Message-ID: <4CEE1677.8030109@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 11/25/2010 5:36 AM, Varadarajan, Charulatha wrote: > Benoit, > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 03:43, Cousson, Benoit wrote: >> On 11/23/2010 3:56 PM, Varadarajan, Charulatha wrote: >>> >>> Add GPIO hwmod data for OMAP2420 >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Charulatha V [...] >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpio.h >>> b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpio.h >> >> That change should not necessarily be there, it is not directly related to >> the subject. >> >> Maybe that should be in an extra patch just before that one. > > I merged these two patches because of a comment to introduce > new variables/structures only in the patch where they are used. > Since "omap_gpio_dev_attr" is being used by hwmod DB I merged > these two patches. Do you think that hwmod DB patches should not > be merged with other patches? Not necessarily, maybe you can just update the changelog and the subject to indicate that you add a new structure as well in this patch. Benoit