From: paulius.zaleckas@gmail.com (Paulius Zaleckas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: Gemini: Add support for PCI BUS
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:19:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CF40AEF.7070200@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201011292102.41155.arnd@arndb.de>
On 11/29/2010 10:02 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 29 November 2010 19:52:55 Paulius Zaleckas wrote:
>> On 11/29/2010 06:45 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> There are many differences between readl and __raw_readl, including
>>>
>>> * __raw_readl does not have barriers and does not serialize with
>>> spinlocks, so it breaks on out-of-order CPUs.
>>> * __raw_readl does not have a specific endianess, while readl is
>>> fixed little-endian, just as the hardware is in this case.
>>> The endian-conversion is a NOP on little-endian ARM, but required
>>> if you actually run on a big-endian ARM (you don't).
>>> * __raw_readl may not be atomic, gcc is free to split the access
>>> into byte wise reads (it normally does not, unless you mark
>>> the pointer __attribute__((packed))).
>>>
>>> In essence, it is almost never a good idea to use __raw_readl, and
>>> the double underscores should tell you so.
>>
>> You are wrong:
>>
>> Since CONFIG_ARM_DMA_MEM_BUFFERABLE is NOT defined for FA526 core,
>> no barriers are in use when using readl. It just translates into
>> le32_to_cpu(__raw_readl(x)). Now this CPU has physical pin for endianess
>> configuration and if you will chose big-endian you will fail to read
>> internal registers, because they ALSO change endianess and le32_to_cpu()
>> will screw it. However it is different when accessing registers through
>> PCI bus, then you need to use readl().
>
> Ok, I only checked that the platform does not support big-endian Linux
> kernel, not if the HW designers screwed up their registers, sorry about
> that.
>
> The other points are of course still valid: If the code ever gets
> used on an out of order CPU, it is broken. More importantly, if someone
> looks at the code as an example for writing another PCI support code,
> it may end up getting copied to some place where it ends up causing
> trouble.
>
> The typical way to deal with mixed-endian hardware reliably is to have
> a header file containing code like
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_GEMINI_BIG_ENDIAN_IO
> #define gemini_readl(x) __swab32(readl(x))
> #define ...
> #else
> #define gemini_readl(x) readl(x))
> #endif
>
> This also takes care of the (not as unlikely as you'd hope) case that
> the next person reusing the PCI hardware wires its endianess different
> from the CPU endianess.
Actually I am not very sure how CPU works in big endian mode :)
I have never tried it and I think only some guys who made it did that.
So readl will work for 99.99% of cases. In datasheet they say that:
"All registers in Gemini use Little Endian and must be accessed by aligned
32-bit word operations. The bus connection interface logic provides an Endian
Conversion function."
For me it looks like it can mean whatever you want :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-29 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-27 12:24 [PATCH] ARM: Gemini: Add support for PCI BUS Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-11-28 19:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-29 12:17 ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-11-29 15:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-29 16:05 ` Paulius Zaleckas
2010-11-29 16:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-29 18:52 ` Paulius Zaleckas
2010-11-29 20:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-29 20:19 ` Paulius Zaleckas [this message]
2010-11-30 8:15 ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-11-30 9:34 ` Paulius Zaleckas
2010-12-01 11:52 ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-12-01 13:08 ` Paulius Zaleckas
2010-12-01 15:02 ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-12-06 10:51 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2010-12-06 12:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-29 19:32 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-11-29 19:57 ` Paulius Zaleckas
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-11-20 14:27 [PATCH] ARM: Gemini: Add support for PCI Bus Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-11-20 19:30 ` Paulius Zaleckas
2010-11-26 11:18 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-11-26 11:57 ` Michał Mirosław
2010-11-27 12:16 ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-11-27 13:01 ` Michał Mirosław
2010-11-27 15:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-29 8:12 ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-11-29 14:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-11-29 14:50 ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-11-29 15:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-30 15:38 ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-11-30 16:05 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-11-30 16:19 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-12-01 15:05 ` Hans Ulli Kroll
2010-11-29 15:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CF40AEF.7070200@gmail.com \
--to=paulius.zaleckas@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).